Abstract:Culture can affect many aspects of one country or area to some extent, including legal system and corporate governance. This paper discusses and analyzes the effect of culture on the incidence of financial restatement. Based on data from 38 countries and areas during the period between 2002 and 2011, this paper examines the impact of culture on financial restatement, while considering investor protection. By concluding and analyzing related theories, this paper adopts Hofstede’s (2001) three national culture dimensions: individualism/collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, and power distance. Besides, investor protection is based on La Porta et al.’s (1998) study. By using data and several statistical methods, we find that:Firstly, probit regressions analysis results indicate that compared with collectivism, individualism is more likely to lead to financial restatement. Countries or areas with high uncertainty avoidance have lower incidence of financial restatement. However, the effect of power distance on financial restatement is not clear. By using the weighted logistic regression method, we obtain the same results. Secondly, we intend to examine whether the effect of culture on the incidence of financial restatement depends on investor protection. This paper finds that investor protection indeed moderates the effect of culture on financial restatement. Specifically, probit regression analysis results indicate that the positive effect of individualism on the incidence of financial restatement is much more pronounced when investor is protected. The negative effect of uncertainty avoidance on the incidence of financial restatement is strengthened when investor protection is better. The results require additional analysis. Our findings suggest that the overall effect ofculture on the probability of financial restatements may diverge due to different settings and situations, such as different investor protection levels. This paper helps enrich and complete the research content of national culture and financial restatement. This paper not only helps extend culture related theories and literatures to reduce the incidence of financial restatement, but also improves our understanding of the combined effect of national culture and other settings in reducing agency cost. Moreover, our findings can help multinational corporations effectively make rules in dealing with firms from other countries and areas under different investor protection levels.

How Does Culture Influence Firm Risk Taking?

How Does Culture Influence Corporate Risk-Taking?

Cultural Values and Corporate Risk-Taking

National Culture and Corporate Risk-Taking Around the World

Effects of National Culture on Bank Risk-Taking Behavior

Does religious culture matter for corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China

National culture: The missing country-level determinant of corporate governance

Media Coverage and Corporate Risk-Taking: International Evidence

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

CEO Power, Bank Risk-Taking and National Culture: International Evidence

Chief Executive Officer's national culture and bank risk‐taking behavior: International evidence

Does national culture influence corporate social responsibility on firm performance?

The Influence of Risk Culture on the Performance of International Joint-Venture Securities

National culture and capital structure dynamics

Does culture matter in corporate cash holdings?

National culture and firm investment efficiency: international evidence

The impact of corporate culture on stock price crash risk: a firm-level analysis

National culture and Islamic bank risk-taking in the Middle East and Asian countries

Individualistic culture and firm default risk: Cross‐country evidence

The effect of culture on financial restatement

National Culture and the Choice Between Bank Debt and Public Debt