Abstract:Purpose We expand the recent literature on the dynamics of capital structure decisions by investigating the impact of national culture on firms' optimal debt ratios and their dynamic re-adjustment process. To this end, we aim at estimating firm-specific speeds of leverage adjustment, allowing for heterogeneous dynamics in firms' capital structure. Design/methodology/approach We use dynamic panel data estimators to analyze the impact of cultural factors on the dynamics of debt ratios. Findings We show that national culture affects the optimal level of leverage and the dynamic rebalancing of debt ratios, both directly and indirectly, by altering the effect of firm characteristics and macroeconomic factors on firms' financing behavior. Firms converge faster towards the optimal leverage in countries with a stronger attitude to conform with the norm, while they are slower where there is a higher propensity to intellectual autonomy. A higher risk aversion and long-run propensity induce over-levered firms to reduce leverage faster, making the adjustment process strongly asymmetric. Moreover, national culture also produces indirect effects by mitigating the impact of asymmetric information on capital structure decisions. Indeed, firms in more individualistic countries display a lower speed of adjustment and a stronger effect of firm characteristics associated with higher agency costs. On the contrary, firms in countries with a higher tendency to conform to social norms, less individualistic and more long-term oriented have a higher adjustment speed and appear to suffer less from agency issues. Our results therefore highlight how national culture affects agency problems within firms, thus suggesting the adoption of country-specific corporate governance provisions accounting for the effects of local cultural traits on managers' behavior. Originality/value We expand the capital structure and governance literature by showing how cultural traits impact on the dynamics of debt ratios. In particular, we show how cultural traits may mitigate or exacerbate the role of agency issues on firms' behavior, hence suggesting that cultural factors may interact with governance rules in shaping firms' decisions. Therefore, our work highlights how policy-makers should include cultural aspects when defining regulation concerning corporate governance.

Cultural Values and Corporate Risk-Taking

How Does Culture Influence Corporate Risk-Taking?

How Does Culture Influence Firm Risk Taking?

National culture: The missing country-level determinant of corporate governance

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Media Coverage and Corporate Risk-Taking: International Evidence

CEO Power, Bank Risk-Taking and National Culture: International Evidence

Does religious culture matter for corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China

Chief Executive Officer's national culture and bank risk‐taking behavior: International evidence

National Culture and Governance on Bondholder Wealth: Evidence from Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances Around the World

National Culture and Corporate Innovation

Individualistic culture and firm default risk: Cross‐country evidence

The impact of national culture on corporate social performance

Dynamic cultures, dynamic responses: The impact on corporate cash holdings amid uncertainty

Does national culture influence corporate social responsibility on firm performance?

National culture and capital structure dynamics

The Influence of Risk Culture on the Performance of International Joint-Venture Securities

National Culture and Tax Avoidance of Multinational Corporations

The Cultural Origins of CEO Overconfidence

National culture and banks stock volatility

National culture and Islamic bank risk-taking in the Middle East and Asian countries