Abstract:Abstract Should we use the language of international criminal law (ICL) to discuss, analyze, and address Western policies of migration control? Such policies have included or resulted in indefinite and inhumane detention, deportations, including through practices of push- and pull-backs and numerous deaths of migrants attempting to cross land or sea borders. And yet, recourse to ICL's conceptual and rhetorical apparatus, often reserved for “unimaginable atrocities,” may seem ill-fitting and an emotive stretch of doctrine. Drawing from international strategic litigation practice on Australian and European policies, this article examines whether the legal concept of crimes against humanity can apply to the deaths, detention, and deportation of migrants, as part and consequence of Western policies of migration control. As migration control policies involve increasingly sophisticated practices of outsourcing and responsibility avoidance, I further ask whether the tools ICL has developed to describe system criminality can trace individual liability against the distance created by such policies. I also inquire into the potential that the transnational nature of migration and the spreading of anti-migration policies have in activating the jurisdiction of courts and the prioritization of the role of the International Criminal Court. Finally, I consider the danger of fetishizing an international punitive approach, before offering some thoughts that aim to bridge a critical approach to international criminal law with its use in meaningful strategic litigation. Throughout the Article, I argue that applying the categories of ICL to Western policies of migration control can contribute to revealing both the potential and the limits of the regime and its institutions, as well as the structures of asymmetry and injustice present both in anti-migration policies and in international criminal law itself.

Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law

Why Sentencing Needs a Separate Trial in the Continental System

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE OF PUNISHMENT IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW THEORY AND PRACTICE

Alternative Punishment In The Criminal Justice System

Sentencing, Legitimacy, and Public Opinion

Atrocity Crimes and International Law: Responsibility to Protect, Intercession, and Non-Forceful Responses by Stacey Henderson [routledge, London, 2022, 182pp, ISBN: 978-1032116457, £120.00 (H/bk)]

On the question of the role of the principle of justice in the system of principles of criminal punishment

Judicial Review of the Balance Between Crime and Punishment

Revisiting the Inevitability of Punishment for Criminal Offense: An Ethical Understanding of the Problem

The Judiciary of International Criminal Law

Approximation of criminal sanctions in the European Union: A wild goose chase?

On the Establishment and Constitutive Requirements of the Crime Against Humanity in the International Criminal Law

Methodology of Criminal Jurisprudence

"Complete Labelling" and Domestic Prosecutions for Crimes Against Humanity

Moral Cognition in Criminal Punishment

Criminal Judicial Idea Towards the 21st Century

Some Issues on the "Objective Punishment Condition"

Beyond the Life Sentence – A Children’s Rights Lens on Sentencing for Murder

The Criminal Policy under the Circumstance of the Contemporary Rule of Law

Criminal Blame, Exclusion and Moral Dialogue

International Criminal Law and the Violence against Migrants