Abstract:Background: In order to meet the demands of contemporary society, German juvenile criminal law needs a necessary reform. Consequently, this article proposes the reintroduction of indeterminate sentencing as an instrument for an overall social benefit to this need for reform and to counter the existing determinate sentencing system in place today. This specific sentencing system is understood to be the current guideline and norm currently implemented. According to Luhmann's systems theory, this contradicts the diversity of societies and the unique individuality of each member within them. In this perspective, individuals have the right to assert their rights and define their norms as long as they do not break the law or commit a criminal offence. Methods: The discussion surrounding indeterminate sentencing reached its conclusion in the late 1990s, so a lack of scientific research exists. However, considering the societal transformation and development of the younger generation, the reintroduction of indeterminate sentencing seems opportune. Niklas Luhmann’s flexible systems theory from the 1980 s is well suited to support this reintroduction. Based on a relevant literature review and the development of tightening in German juvenile law, this article adopts an analytical approach supported by social, legal and political research. It provides a framework elucidating the reasons and the appropriate form for reintroduc ing indeterminate sentencing as a useful method to increase resocialis ation among the youth . This framework includes practical approaches such as combining education, professional training and social education, all aimed at implementing a rehabilitative approach within the juvenile justice system, similar to the original law that was abandoned. Results and Conclusions: If this occurs, the indeterminate sentence allows for a more individualised approach, establishing an individual-oriented minimum sentence while maintaining a maximum duration. Thus, it aligns with Luhmann's flexible systems theory approach and proves relevant to the current circumstances of the youth generation. Such an approach offers greater benefits by emphasising the integration of education within the prison sentence for resocialisation, surpassing the capabilities of the current determinate sentencing in juvenile criminal law. The actual recidivism rates average between 25% and 30% depending on the sentence. With an education-focused approach adjusted to the juvenile offender , coupled with a realistic future- oriented education system in and after the sentence, the process of resocialis ation stands a better chance of success . Although the research on this topic is in its early stages, this approach serves as an initial step towards instigating the necessary reform within juvenile law.

Beyond the Life Sentence – A Children’s Rights Lens on Sentencing for Murder

Child-Friendly Justice: turning law into reality

System and conditions of criminal punishment for juveniles

Child-friendly Justice and Procedural Safeguards For Children in Criminal Proceedings: New Momentum for Children in Conflict with the Law?

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF THE PROCEDURE FOR APPLICATION OF DISCIPLINARY INFLUENCE MEASURES TO JUVENILE PRISONERS

Young, Accused and Detained; Awful, But Lawful? Pre-Trial Detention and Children’s Rights Protection in Contemporary Western Societies

More Education of Juvenile Offenders In Sentences Of Imprisonment: A Reform And Justification Approach As A Consequence Of Niklas Luhmann's Systems Theory

Children’s Criminal Perception; Lessons from Neurolaw

Assisted Suicides and 'Mercy Killings': Voluntary Requests, or Vulnerable Adults? A Critique of Criminal Law and Sentencing

Beyond pre‐emptive criminalisation: towards a child‐friendly youth justice

A Re-Evaluation of the Role of Criminal law in Combating Parental Violence in the Netherlands

Punishment after Life: How Attitudes about Longer-than-Life Sentences Expose the Rules of Retribution

Study on the Reconstruction of the Concept of Criminal Sanctions in the Juvenile Justice System

"It's doom alone that counts": can international human rights law be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?

Raising the minimum age of criminal responsibility: lessons from the Scottish experience

Life after life: Recidivism among individuals formerly sentenced to mandatory juvenile life without parole

Kevin and Peter: responses to two ‘preventable deaths’

Criminal Liability of Minors in Comparative Law: Special References to Japan and China. Implications

Sentencing, Legitimacy, and Public Opinion

Improving Outcomes for Children Affected by Parental Involvement with the Criminal Justice System in Scotland

Ensuring the rights of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities within child justice systems