Abstract:1 Inadequacy in association rule mining for stock movement prediction Among all the data mining problems, discovering association rules from large databases is probably the most signiicant contribution from the database community to the eld 1, 2, 5, 9, 10, 7]. The most often cited application of association rules is market basket analysis using transaction databases from supermarkets and departmental stores. We can discover rules like R 1 : 80% of customers who bought diaper also bought beer (diaper) beer (20%; 80%)), where 80% is the conndence level of the rule and 20% is the support level of the rule indicating how frequent the rule holds. The same concept can be applied to other applications as well. For example, to predict the stock market price movement, we can construct a transaction database in such a way that: each record (transaction) in the database represents one trading day and contains a list of winners (closing price is x% more than the previous day's closing price where x% is the trading overhead). Thus we can nd rules like R 2 : When the prices of IBM and SUN go up, 80% of time the price of Microsoft goes up (on the same day). While rule R 2 reeects some relationship among the prices, its role in price prediction is limited. It is rather obvious that the traders may be more interested in the following kind of rules: R 3 : If the prices of IBM and SUN go up, Microsoft's will most likely (80% of time) go up the next day. Unfortunately, current association rule miners cannot discover this kind of rules. Since the stock movement prediction is time-related, we thought sequential pattern discovery 3] might be of help. To apply sequential pattern mining techniques, we reorganize that database as follows: each stock corresponds to a customer, and transactions are represented by ups and downs. The rules that can be found are like R 4 : 80% stock will go up after 3 consecutive loses. This is not really what we like. There is a fundamental diierence between rule R 3 and the other rules. The classical association rules express the associations among items purchased by one customer or share price movement within a day, i.e., associations among items within the same transaction record. We call them intra-transaction association rules. Sequential pattern discovery is also intra-transaction mining in nature because each sequence …

Breaking the Barrier of Transactions

Dtgc-Tree: A New Strategy Of Association Rules Mining

Using Quantitative Association Rules in Collaborative Filtering

Beyond intratransaction association analysis

Density-Based Mining of Quantitative Association Rules

From Intra-Transaction to Generalized Inter-Transaction: Landscaping Multidimensional Contexts in Association Rule Mining

TCOM, an Innovative Data Structure for Mining Association Rules among Infrequent Items

T-Closeness Slicing: A New Privacy-Preserving Approach for Transactional Data Publishing.

Mining Privacy-Preserving Association Rules based on Parallel Processing in Cloud Computing

An Improved Definition of Multidimensional Inter-transaction Association Rule.

Efficient association rule mining among infrequent items

Introduction to the Special Issue on Pattern-Driven Mining, Analytics, and Prediction for Decision Making, Part 1

Virtual Transaction Model to Support Workflow Applications.

Knowledge Discovery in Cryptocurrency Transactions: A Survey

Mining Transactional Data To Produce Extended Association Rules Using Collaborative Apriori, Fsa-Red And M5p Predictive Algorithm As A Basis Of Business Actions

Mining Patterns in Long Sequential Data with Noise.

Stock Movement Prediction and N-dimensional Inter-Transaction Association Rules

Fuzzy Logic-Based Mining Strategy for Transaction Congestion Management in Blockchain Networks

SUMMARY: Efficiently Summarizing Transactions for Clustering

Distributed Cross-Blockchain Transactions

Dissecting Bitcoin and Ethereum Transactions: On the Lack of Transaction Contention and Prioritization Transparency in Blockchains