Dissecting Bitcoin and Ethereum Transactions: On the Lack of Transaction Contention and Prioritization Transparency in Blockchains

Johnnatan Messias,Vabuk Pahari,Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,Krishna P. Gummadi,Patrick Loiseau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.06962

2023-05-24

Abstract:In permissionless blockchains, transaction issuers include a fee to incentivize miners to include their transactions. To accurately estimate this prioritization fee for a transaction, transaction issuers (or blockchain participants, more generally) rely on two fundamental notions of transparency, namely contention and prioritization transparency. Contention transparency implies that participants are aware of every pending transaction that will contend with a given transaction for inclusion. Prioritization transparency states that the participants are aware of the transaction or prioritization fees paid by every such contending transaction. Neither of these notions of transparency holds well today. Private relay networks, for instance, allow users to send transactions privately to miners. Besides, users can offer fees to miners via either direct transfers to miners' wallets or off-chain payments -- neither of which are public. In this work, we characterize the lack of contention and prioritization transparency in Bitcoin and Ethereum resulting from such practices. We show that private relay networks are widely used and private transactions are quite prevalent. We show that the lack of transparency facilitates miners to collude and overcharge users who may use these private relay networks despite them offering little to no guarantees on transaction prioritization. The lack of these transparencies in blockchains has crucial implications for transaction issuers as well as the stability of blockchains. Finally, we make our data sets and scripts publicly available.

Cryptography and Security

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is that in permissionless blockchains, transaction initiators cannot accurately estimate the transaction priority fees because the current blockchains lack contention transparency and prioritization transparency. Specifically:

1. **Contention Transparency**: It means that participants can be aware of all pending transactions, and these transactions will compete with a given transaction to enter a block. However, due to the existence of private relay networks, some transactions can be privately sent to miners, resulting in other participants being unable to fully understand all pending transactions.

2. **Prioritization Transparency**: It means that participants can be aware of each transaction or priority fee. However, users can provide additional fees by directly transferring to miners' wallets or making off - chain payments, and these fees are not public.

These problems lead to the following consequences:
- Transaction initiators cannot accurately estimate the required priority fees, which may result in excessive fee payments.
- Miners can collude through under - the - table operations (such as private transactions) to jointly charge excessive fees to users who use private relay networks, and these users may not be guaranteed corresponding transaction priorities.
- The lack of transparency has an important impact on transaction initiators and the stability of the blockchain.

To study these problems, the author conducted a detailed analysis of private transactions in Bitcoin and Ethereum, revealing the widespread use of private relay networks and their impact on transaction transparency. Experiments have proven that Bitcoin miners have collusive behavior when including dark - fee transactions, and the Flashbots relay network in Ethereum is widely used for bundling transactions, especially for calling decentralized exchange (DEX) contracts to obtain maximum extractable value (MEV) opportunities.

Overall, this paper aims to reveal the transparency problems existing in the current blockchain systems and provides specific evidence through empirical analysis.