Abstract:Objective: To evalute the accuracy and clinical outcome of a real-time navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants. Methods: Twenty-four patients [9 males and 15 females, mean age was (50.8±14.7) years old], from January 2015 to December 2019, with 96 zygomatic implants placed under a real-time navigation system in Department of Second Dental Center and Department of Oral Implantology of Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine were included in the study. The preoperative and the postoperative multislice CT or cone-beam CT were fused to measure and record the entry, exit and angle deviation between the planned and placed implants. The implants were divided into groups according to implant insertion approach (real-time navigation and free-hand), implant length (<47.5 mm and ≥47.5 mm) and implant position (proximal and distal implant). And the differences of implant accuracy were analyzed. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were also recorded. The implant survival rate was evaluated after 6 months follow-up. A P value<0.05 indicates statistical significance. Results: The mean entry, exit and angle deviation of zygomatic implants were (1.49±0.64) mm, [2.03(1.58, 2.40)] mm and (2.49°±1.12°), respectively. The average entry, exit and angle deviation of the navigation guided implant insertion group were (1.45±0.60) mm, (1.96±0.44) mm and (2.66±1.13°) respectively, while those of the free-hand group were (1.50±0.64) mm, (2.04±0.79) mm and (2.50°±1.13°) respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The average entry, exit and angle deviation of the group with length<47.5 mm were (1.42±0.60) mm, (2.13±0.60) mm and (2.61°±1.08°) respectively and those of the group with length ≥ 47.5 mm were (1.52±0.65) mm, (1.98±0.82) mm and (2.43°±1.14°) respectively. No significant difference was found between the two groups (P>0.05). In proximal implant group, the average entry, exit and angle deviation were (1.55±0.69) mm, (2.05±0.92) mm and (2.48°±1.16 °) respectively while those of distal implant group were (1.43±0.57) mm, (2.01±0.57) mm and (2.49°±1.10°), respectively. No significant difference was detected between the two groups (P>0.05). All zygomatic implants were placed uneventfully. There were no intra-operative complications, and post-operative reversible complications developed in 3 patients. Two zygomatic implants were lost and the overall zygomatic implant survival rate was 97.9% (94/96) within a follow-up of 6 months. Conclusions: Quad zygomatic implant placement can be achieved with high accuracy and predictable clinical outcome under guidance of a real-time navigation system.

Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement

Dynamic Navigation for Prosthetically Driven Zygomatic Implant Placement in Extensive Maxillary Defects: Results of a Prospective Case Series.

[Accuracy and Clinical Outcome of a Real-Time Surgical Navigation System for the Placement of Quad Zygomatic Implants].

Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study

Accuracy of a real-time surgical navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants in the severe atrophic maxilla: A pilot clinical study.

Application of Real-Time Surgical Navigation for Zygomatic Implant Insertion in Patients with Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla.

Real-Time Surgical Navigation System for the Placement of Zygomatic Implants with Severe Bone Deficiency

A Novel Extraoral Registration Method for a Dynamic Navigation System Guiding Zygomatic Implant Placement in Patients with Maxillectomy Defects.

Dynamic Navigation-Guided Robotic Placement of Zygomatic Implants

Application Of A Surgical Navigation System In The Rehabilitation Of Maxillary Defects Using Zygoma Implants: Report Of One Case

Real-Time Navigation in Zygomatic Implant Placement

Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The accuracy of surgical automatic robotic assisted implants placement in edentulous maxilla - an in vitro study

Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Using Task‐Autonomous Robotic System or Dynamic Navigation: An In Vitro Study

The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study

Application Of A Surgical Navigation System For Zygoma Implant Surgery

Reliability of Real‐time Surgical Navigation Guidance for Four Zygomatic Implants in the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla – a Bone‐to‐implant Contact Analysis

The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series

Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery

The Use of Dynamic Navigation for the Placement of Zygoma Implants. A Cadaver Study to Compare Accuracy