Abstract:Background Preoperative anxiety is an unpleasant state of tension that may impact patients' post-operative pain and satisfaction. The level of preoperative anxiety should be routinely identified. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) is a self-reported questionnaire that is used to quickly assess preoperative anxiety and information needs with good psychometric properties. Objectives To validate the Chinese version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and to explore coping strategies used by patients in dealing with surgery and anesthetic. Methods The cross-cultural validation of APAIS involved the translation of a Chinese version of APAIS and an investigation of its psychometric properties and clinical applicability. Forward-back translation and a pilot study were performed to produce a Chinese adaptation of APAIS. The inpatients of the orthopedic, otolaryngology, and general surgery department scheduled for general anesthesia surgery were enrolled to complete psychometric testing. The reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were calculated to assess construct validity. The criteria validity was analyzed using the correlation between APAIS and State-trait anxiety inventory-state (STAI-S) and Visual analogue scale-anxiety (VAS-A). Coping styles were evaluated using the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire (MCMQ) score that covered three domains: confrontation, avoidance, and resignation. The impact of different coping styles on patients' anxiety was explored. Results A total of 204 valid questionnaires were collected the day before surgery. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.862 for the anxiety scale and 0.830 for the information scale. Exploratory factor analysis with oblique rotation revealed two factors that explained 76.45% of the total variances. A confirmatory factor analysis showed a two-factor model with an adequate model fit (root mean square error of approximation: 0.073, goodness-of-fit: 0.966). The APAIS anxiety score significantly correlated with STAI-S (r = 0.717, P < 0.01) and VAS-A (r = 0.720, P < 0.01). For the three coping strategies, preoperative anxiety had a low correlation with confrontation (r = 0.33, P < 0.01) and resignation (r = 0.22, P < 0.05). Conclusions The Chinese version of APAIS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing preoperative anxiety. Use of this measurement tool for Chinese patients is feasible and shows promising results.

Chinese version of the Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 and its reliability and validity

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Preoperative Assessment of Readiness Tool among Surgical Patients

Translation, adaptation, and validation of ASK nasal-12 into Brazilian Portuguese

Chinese Translation of the Coma Recovery Scale—Revised

How We Assess the Perioperative Anxiety of Surgical Patients with Pulmonary Nodules: the Revision of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) in Chinese

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS)

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and informa-tion scale

Preliminary test of the reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Nurse Spiritual Therapeutics Scale/

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Mandarin Version of the BDDQ-AS for Rhinoplasty Patients

Validation of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck(fact-H&n) Scale(chinese Version) for Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Chinese adaptation and validation of the chronic rhinosinusitis-patient-reported outcome: Assessment of health-related quality-of-life

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

The validity and reliability of a Chinese version of neck pain and disability scale

Translation and validation of Neurological Assessment Competency Scale in neurology nurses

Preliminary Study on Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index.

The Validation and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Speech Handicap Index for Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22(Srs-22)patient Questionnaire

[Validation of a Chinese Version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14].

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioural Control and Intention to Pursue a Career in Mental Health Nursing Scale