Abstract:Altruistic punishment is key to establishing cooperation and maintaining social order, yet its developmental trends across cultures remain unclear. Using computational reinforcement learning models, we provided the first evidence of how social feedback dynamically influences group-biased altruistic punishment across cultures and the lifespan. Study 1 ( n = 371) found that Chinese participants exhibited higher learning rates than Americans when socially incentivized to punish unfair allocations. Additionally, Chinese adults showed slower learning and less exploration when punishing ingroups than outgroups, a pattern absent in American counterparts, potentially reflecting a tendency towards ingroup favoritism that may contribute to reinforcing collectivist values. Study 2 ( n = 430, aged 12–52) further showed that such ingroup favoritism develops with age. Chinese participants' learning rates for ingroup punishment decreased from adolescence into adulthood, while outgroup rates stayed constant, implying a process of cultural learning. Our findings highlight cultural and age-related variations in altruistic punishment learning, with implications for social reinforcement learning and culturally sensitive educational practices promoting fairness and altruism. How do people from different cultures and ages learn to punish unfair behavior? Such punishment is crucial for societal cohesion, yet remains poorly understood. We tested participants from China and the USA, and from early adolescence to adulthood. Chinese individuals, compared to Americans, quickly associate punishing unfair actions with social feedback. However, they tend to hesitate when learning to punish ingroup members, unlike American individuals. Interestingly, this preference for ingroup members becomes more prominent as Chinese participants grow from adolescence into adulthood, reflecting a gradual adoption of collectivist values. These findings emphasize how cultural norms and developmental stages strongly influence the learning processes that shape social decision-making, offering insights for creating interventions that promote justice and cooperation in diverse societies.

Group punishment does not always discount: Cultural difference in punishment of individuals and groups

Cultural Difference in Perception of Individual versus Organizational Bribery

Reflexive or Reflective? Group Bias in Third-Party Punishment in Chinese and Western Cultures

Calculated Punishment

Is Individual Bribery or Organizational Bribery More Intolerable in China (versus in the United States)? Advancing Theory on the Perception of Corrupt Acts

Reinforcement learning of altruistic punishment differs between cultures and across the lifespan

Who Is Your Biggest Critic? Cultural Variation in Moral Judgments of the Self and Others

In-group and Out-Group Social Influence on Punishment in Unfair Situations

Culture Differences and Individual Choice:An Empirical Study Based on Game Theory

Differences Between Chinese and American Criminal's Thinking Styles

Enhancing and Weakening Conformity in Third‐party Punishment: the Role of Empathic Concern

A World of Blame to Go Around: Cross-Cultural Determinants of Responsibility and Punishment Judgments

Personal and Collective Culpability Judgment

Preschoolers' Group Bias in Punishing Selfishness in the Ultimatum Game.

Research on Differences of Punishment and Reward: Evidence from Public Goods Experiments in the Stranger Condition

Conditional Punishment: Descriptive Social Norms Drive Negative Reciprocity

Human Punishment Behavior

Cross-societal variation in norm enforcement systems

Generosity in dictator game and social value orientation predicted the type of costly punishment in ultimatum game

Punishment as a mechanism to maintain bilateral cooperation: A social behavior experiment

Symmetric Vs. Asymmetric Punishment Regimes for Bribery