Comprehensive analysis of modified carbon dioxide heat pump systems and determination of operating schemes for residential heating: A multi-objective optimization approach
Liwei Dong,Huan Tong,Xuetao Liu,Minxia Li,Jintao Niu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118272
IF: 10.4
2024-04-01
Energy Conversion and Management
Abstract:For the performance improvement of carbon dioxide heat pump systems, two new systems, a mechanical subcooling heat pump system that auxiliary cycle with ejector and a mechanical subcooling heat pump system that major cycle with ejector are proposed. The new systems combine the advantages of mechanical subcooling and ejectors. Three original carbon dioxide systems including a base system, a base system with ejector and a mechanical subcooling heat pump system are chosen as comparison systems to demonstrate the advantages of new systems. Meanwhile, three kinds of heating terminals and six typical cities in different regions are selected for comprehensive evaluation. Furthermore, the optimal operating conditions for each system with traditionally designed radiator, floor-coil radiator and small temperature difference fan-coil unit as terminals applied in different regions are obtained through multi-objective optimization. Compared with the base system, the coefficient of performance of the new system that auxiliary cycle with ejector and the new system that major cycle with ejector are improved by 17.58–20.90 % and 25.78–26.87 %, respectively, under rated working conditions. More importantly, the above new modified systems can operate at optimal conditions due to the reduction of optimal major discharge pressure. The new system that major cycle with ejector also reduces the minimum evaporating temperature limit to −40 °C, providing better low-temperature adaptability. Compared with the original mechanical subcooling system, the initial investment cost of the new system that major cycle with ejector is increased by only about 1.46–3.41 % under the optimal design conditions. For cities other than Harbin, the life cycle cost of the base system with ejector is lower than that of all remaining systems throughout the entire life cycle, which is the preferred system. In addition, the new system that major cycle with ejector is also a system that could be considered for selection. The life cycle cost of the new system that major cycle with ejector can be below that of the original mechanical subcooling system within 7 years and that's an acceptable amount of time. For Harbin, the life cycle cost of the new system that major cycle with ejector is lower than that of the base system with ejector after 6 years of running time. And the life cycle cost of the new system that major cycle with ejector is 12.7 % lower than that of the base system with ejector when the operating time reaches 15 years. The new system that major cycle with ejector will be more competitive in modifying the carbon dioxide heat pump systems if the equipment quality can be improved to extend operating time. The above analysis will provide a reference for the selection of systems and operating schemes in different regions.
energy & fuels,thermodynamics,mechanics