The Effect Of Meta-Knowledge On Students' Performance Evaluation

Jing Qian
2016-01-01
Abstract:In order to enhance students' learning performance, periodic evaluations are necessary. As educators, we are not only interested in assessing how well the students' have learned, but also in how well they think they have learned. It is well known that overconfidence exists for self-evaluation, but do all students over-evaluate themselves? Are there systematic patterns of individual differences? By asking students to rate their meta-knowledge, we collected data for an in class quiz to find out how students' perceived-performance is related to their actual performance. We found that for above-average students tend to under-evaluate themselves, but below-average students tend to be more overconfident. This method of self-evaluation is easy to apply in class and easy to analyze. We propose that assessing meta-knowledge of students may be an effective feedback on their learning, and it is clear and convincing for both educators and students.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?