Abstract:Abstract Background Peer-assisted learning is a method of active learning that is gaining traction throughout higher education. In the medical curriculum, peer-assisted learning has been the subject of independent studies collecting various types of data. However, an overall analysis of those studies providing objective measurements of the influence of peer-assisted learning could be particularly useful for teachers and students alike in a knowledge-heavy curriculum such as medicine. In this study we set out to analyse the efficacy of peer-assisted learning on medical students’ learning of clinical knowledge and skills that is assessed through some objective examination, and thereby define whether such approaches have a reproducible benefit for inclusion in the medical curriculum. Methods Databases including Pubmed, Embase and Science Direct were searched for relevant studies containing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of peer-assisted learning published before July 29th ,2020. A meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Thirteen studies involving 2,003 medical students were analyzed for clinical knowledge and skills gains that included some objective measurement of learning. The results of this meta-analysis indicated that considering all these studies together, peer-assisted learning leads to improvements in clinical knowledge and skills learning for medical students compared with traditional teacher-led passive learning. One study was found likely to be a source of significant heterogeneity, and when this was removed from the meta-analysis, the pooled effect was no longer statistically significant. Conclusions Peer-assisted learning can be an effective method of learning applied to medical student education. Active learning through peer-assisted learning should be seen as complementary to teacher-led approaches. Two of the individual studies on peer-assisted learning show a statistically significant benefit on examination performance compared to the other studies considered, that either show negligible benefits or at worst no detriment in learning. This highlights the need for more high-quality and focused randomized control trials to identify those critical parameters that lead to improved student learning using such approaches.

The Effect of Peer Assessment on Non-Cognitive Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis

The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies

The role of technology-facilitated peer assessment and supporting strategies: a meta-analysis

Peer assessment enhances student learning

The Effect of Classroom-Based Physical Activity Elements on Academic Performance in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis

The impact of peer competition and collaboration on gamified learning performance in educational settings: a Meta-analytical study

The effect of self-assessment on academic performance and the role of explicitness: a meta-analysis

How effective is peer interaction in facilitating learning? A meta-analysis.

The Impact of Self-assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis Study

A meta-analysis of peer-assisted learning on examination performance in clinical knowledge and skills education

Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education

A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors

The Effect Of Meta-Knowledge On Students' Performance Evaluation

Examining the effectiveness of gamification as a tool promoting teaching and learning in educational settings: a meta-analysis

The Study of Peer Assessment Impact on Group Learning Activities

Factors That Determine the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning: a Mixed Methods Design

Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy

Peer and self-assessment practices for writing across the curriculum: learner-differentiated effects on writing achievement

The Impact of Teacher Feedback on Non-cognitive Aspects of Student's Performance in Higher Education: A Review of Research

The effects of peer judgements on teamwork and self-assessment ability in collaborative group work