Cortico-amygdalar Connectivity and Externalizing/internalizing Behavior in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Nakua Hajer,Hawco Colin,Forde Natalie J.,Jacobs Grace R.,Joseph Michael,Voineskos Aristotle N.,Wheeler Anne L.,Lai Meng-Chuan,Szatmari Peter,Kelley Elizabeth,Liu Xudong,Georgiades Stelios,Nicolson Rob,Schachar Russell,Crosbie Jennifer,Anagnostou Evdokia,Lerch Jason P.,Arnold Paul D.,Ameis Stephanie H.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02483-0
IF: 12.81
2021-01-01
Biological Psychiatry
Abstract:Background Externalizing and internalizing behaviors contribute to clinical impairment in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Although associations between externalizing or internalizing behaviors and cortico-amygdalar connectivity have been found in clinical and non-clinical pediatric samples, no previous study has examined whether similar shared associations are present across children with different NDDs. Methods Multi-modal neuroimaging and behavioral data from the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental Disorders (POND) Network were used. POND participants aged 6–18 years with a primary diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), as well as typically developing children (TDC) with T1-weighted, resting-state fMRI or diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and parent-report Child Behavioral Checklist (CBCL) data available, were analyzed (total n = 346). Associations between externalizing or internalizing behavior and cortico-amygdalar structural and functional connectivity indices were examined using linear regressions, controlling for age, gender, and image-modality specific covariates. Behavior-by-diagnosis interaction effects were also examined. Results No significant linear associations (or diagnosis-by-behavior interaction effects) were found between CBCL-measured externalizing or internalizing behaviors and any of the connectivity indices examined. Post-hoc bootstrapping analyses indicated stability and reliability of these null results. Conclusions The current study provides evidence towards an absence of a shared linear relationship between internalizing or externalizing behaviors and cortico-amygdalar connectivity properties across a transdiagnostic sample of children with different primary NDD diagnoses and TDC. Different methodological approaches, including incorporation of multi-dimensional behavioral data (e.g., task-based fMRI) or clustering approaches may be needed to clarify complex brain-behavior relationships relevant to externalizing/internalizing behaviors in heterogeneous clinical NDD populations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?