A transdiagnostic examination of cognitive heterogeneity in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders

Sarah Al-Saoud Emily S. Nichols Marie Brossard-Racine Conor J. Wild Loretta Norton Emma G. Duerden a Applied Psychology,Faculty of Education,Western University,London,Ontario,Canadab Western Institute for Neuroscience,Western University,London,Ontario,Canadac School of Physical and Occupational Therapy,McGill University,Montreal,Quebec,Canadad Physiology and Pharmacology,Western University,London,Ontario,Canadae Psychology,King's University College,Western University,London,Ontario,Canadaf Neuroscience,Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry,Western University,London,Canadag Psychiatry,Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry,Western University,London,Canada

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2364957

IF: 2.597

2024-06-12

Child Neuropsychology

Abstract:Children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders demonstrate extensive cognitive heterogeneity that is not adequately captured by traditional diagnostic systems, emphasizing the need for alternative assessment and classification techniques. Using a transdiagnostic approach, a retrospective cohort study of cognitive functioning was conducted using a large heterogenous sample ( n = 1529) of children and adolescents 7 to 18 years of age with neurodevelopmental disorders. Measures of short-term memory, verbal ability, and reasoning were administered to participants with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), comorbid ADHD/ASD, and participants without neurodevelopmental disorders (non-NDD) using a 12-task, web-based neurocognitive testing battery. Unsupervised machine learning techniques were used to create a self-organizing map, an artificial neural network, in conjunction with k-means clustering to identify data-driven subgroups. The study aims were to: 1) identify cognitive profiles in the sample using a data-driven approach, and 2) determine their correspondence with traditional diagnostic statuses. Six clusters representing different cognitive profiles were identified, including participants with varying forms of cognitive impairment. Diagnostic status did not correspond with cluster-membership, providing evidence for the application of transdiagnostic approaches to understanding cognitive heterogeneity in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders. Additionally, the findings suggest that many typically developing participants may have undiagnosed learning difficulties, emphasizing the need for accessible cognitive assessment tools in school-based settings.

clinical neurology