Abstract:Humans have the ability to intentionally forget information via different strategies, included suppression of encoding (directed forgetting) and mental replacement of the item to encode (thought substitution). These strategies may rely on different neural mechanisms; namely, encoding suppression may induce prefrontally mediated inhibition, whereas thought substitution is potentially accomplished through modulating contextual representations. Yet, few studies have directly related inhibitory processing to encoding suppression, or tested its involvement in thought substitution. Here, we directly tested whether encoding suppression recruits inhibitory mechanisms with a cross-task design, relating the behavioral and neural data from male and female participants in a Stop Signal task (a task specifically testing inhibitory processing) to a directed forgetting task with both encoding suppression (Forget) and thought substitution (Imagine) cues. Behaviorally, Stop Signal task performance (stop signal reaction times) was related to the magnitude of encoding suppression, but not thought substitution. Two complementary neural analyses corroborated the behavioral result. Namely, brain-behavior analysis demonstrated that the magnitude of right-frontal beta activity following stop signals was related to stop signal reaction times and successful encoding suppression, but not thought substitution; and classifiers trained to discriminate successful and unsuccessful stopping in the Stop Signal task could also classify successful and unsuccessful forgetting following Forget cues, but not Imagine cues. Importantly, inhibitory neural mechanisms were engaged following Forget cues at a later time than motor stopping. These findings not only support an inhibitory account of directed forgetting, and that thought substitution engages separate mechanisms, but also potentially identify a specific time in which inhibition occurs when suppressing encoding.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Forgetting often seems like an unintended experience, but forgetting can be intentional, and can be accomplished with multiple strategies. These strategies, including encoding suppression and thought substitution, may rely on different neural mechanisms. Here, we test the hypothesis that encoding suppression engages domain-general prefrontally driven inhibitory control mechanisms, while thought substitution does not. Using cross-task analyses, we provide evidence that encoding suppression engages the same inhibitory mechanisms used for stopping motor actions, but these mechanisms are not engaged by thought substitution. These findings not only support the notion that mnemonic encoding processes can be directly inhibited, but also have broad relevance, as certain populations with disrupted inhibitory processing may be more successful accomplishing intentional forgetting through thought substitution strategies.

Task compliance predicts suppression-induced forgetting in a large sample

Driven to forget: Task compliance predicts suppression-induced forgetting in a large sample

A multiverse analysis of early attempts to replicate memory suppression with the Think/No-think Task

Suppression-Induced Forgetting as a Model for Repression

On the role of inhibition in suppression-induced forgetting

Differential Recruitment of Inhibitory Control Processes by Directed Forgetting and Thought Substitution

Intentional forgetting needs intentional remembering.

Intentional forgetting in excessive behavior: direct suppression and thought substitution

Hindering memory suppression by perturbing the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

Reduced hippocampal-cortical connectivity during memory suppression predicts the ability to forget unwanted memories

Selective directed forgetting: Eliminating output order and demand characteristics explanations

Two replications of Wiechert et al.'s (2023) online Think/No-Think study in undergraduate students

Memory consolidation of attended information is optional: Comment on Jiang et al. (2016).

Reconsidering Unconscious Persistence: Suppressing Unwanted Memories Reduces Their Indirect Expression in Later Thoughts

Intentional forgetting in younger and older adolescents

Electrophysiological signature of suppression of competitors during interference resolution

Can’t forget: disruption of the right prefrontal cortex impairs voluntary forgetting in a recognition test

Suppressing the Maintenance of Information in Working Memory Alters Long-term Memory Traces

Do we actively inhibit recently attended but no longer relevant information

The Effect of Negative Emotion to Suppression Forgetting

Does inhibition cause forgetting after selective retrieval? A reanalysis and failure to replicate