Abstract:Humans have the ability to intentionally forget information via different strategies, included suppression of encoding (directed forgetting) and mental replacement of the item to encode (thought substitution). These strategies may rely on different neural mechanisms; namely, encoding suppression may induce prefrontally mediated inhibition, whereas thought substitution is potentially accomplished through modulating contextual representations. Yet, few studies have directly related inhibitory processing to encoding suppression, or tested its involvement in thought substitution. Here, we directly tested whether encoding suppression recruits inhibitory mechanisms with a cross-task design, relating the behavioral and neural data from male and female participants in a Stop Signal task (a task specifically testing inhibitory processing) to a directed forgetting task with both encoding suppression (Forget) and thought substitution (Imagine) cues. Behaviorally, Stop Signal task performance (stop signal reaction times) was related to the magnitude of encoding suppression, but not thought substitution. Two complementary neural analyses corroborated the behavioral result. Namely, brain-behavior analysis demonstrated that the magnitude of right-frontal beta activity following stop signals was related to stop signal reaction times and successful encoding suppression, but not thought substitution; and classifiers trained to discriminate successful and unsuccessful stopping in the Stop Signal task could also classify successful and unsuccessful forgetting following Forget cues, but not Imagine cues. Importantly, inhibitory neural mechanisms were engaged following Forget cues at a later time than motor stopping. These findings not only support an inhibitory account of directed forgetting, and that thought substitution engages separate mechanisms, but also potentially identify a specific time in which inhibition occurs when suppressing encoding.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Forgetting often seems like an unintended experience, but forgetting can be intentional, and can be accomplished with multiple strategies. These strategies, including encoding suppression and thought substitution, may rely on different neural mechanisms. Here, we test the hypothesis that encoding suppression engages domain-general prefrontally driven inhibitory control mechanisms, while thought substitution does not. Using cross-task analyses, we provide evidence that encoding suppression engages the same inhibitory mechanisms used for stopping motor actions, but these mechanisms are not engaged by thought substitution. These findings not only support the notion that mnemonic encoding processes can be directly inhibited, but also have broad relevance, as certain populations with disrupted inhibitory processing may be more successful accomplishing intentional forgetting through thought substitution strategies.

Selective directed forgetting: Eliminating output order and demand characteristics explanations

Selective directed forgetting is mediated by the lateral prefrontal cortex: Preliminary evidence with transcranial direct current stimulation

How varying cue duration influences item-method directed forgetting: A novel selective retrieval interpretation

Directed forgetting in associative memory: Dissociating item and associative impairment.

Intentional forgetting in younger and older adolescents

Elaborately rehearsed information can be forgotten: A new paradigm to investigate directed forgetting

People sometimes remember to forget: Strategic retrieval from the list before last enables directed forgetting of the most recent information.

Aging and directed forgetting: Evidence for an associative deficit but no evidence for an inhibition deficit.

Forgetting under difficult conditions: Item-method directed forgetting under perceptual processing constraints

Can People Intentionally and Selectively Forget Prose Material?

Driven to forget: Task compliance predicts suppression-induced forgetting in a large sample

Suppress to Forget: The Effect of a Mindfulness-Based Strategy during an Emotional Item-Directed Forgetting Paradigm

Does inhibition cause forgetting after selective retrieval? A reanalysis and failure to replicate

Intending to forget is not easy: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Suppression-Induced Forgetting as a Model for Repression

Differential Recruitment of Inhibitory Control Processes by Directed Forgetting and Thought Substitution

Studies of Directed Forgetting in a Variant of the List -Method

The role of retrieval practice in directed forgetting.

On the role of inhibition in suppression-induced forgetting

The short- and long-term consequences of directed forgetting in a working memory task

Removing information from working memory with a delay: Effective but not beneficial