Abstract:Abstract Objective Since the introduction of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dentistry, this technology has enabled distortion-free three-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery diagnosis. However, CBCT is associated with significantly higher radiation exposure than traditional routine bidimensional examinations for orthodontic diagnosis, although low-dose protocols have markedly reduced radiation exposure over time. The objective of this preliminary feasibility study is to compare the accuracy and diagnostic capabilities of an already-validated three-dimensional cephalometric analysis on CBCT to those of an analysis on 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (3T-MRI) to assess whether the latter can deliver a comparable quality of information while avoiding radiation exposure. Materials and methods In order to test the feasibility of three-dimensional cephalometry on 3T-MRI, 18 subjects (4 male; 14 female) with mean age 37.8 ± SD 10.2, who had undergone both maxillofacial CBCT and maxillofacial 3T-MRI for various purposes within 1 month, were selected from the archive of the Department of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery of Fondazione Ospedale Policlinico Maggiore, IRCCS, Milano, Italy. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis composed of ten midsagittal and four bilateral landmarks and 24 measurements (11 angular, 13 linear) was performed on both scans using Mimics Research® v. 17.0 (NV, Technologielaan 15, 3001 Leuven, Belgium). Cephalometric analysis was performed twice by two independent orthodontists for each scan, and each orthodontist repeated the measurements 3 weeks later. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® 20.00 for Windows (IBM® Corporation, Sommers, NY, USA). A Bland-Altman test for each cephalometric value was performed to assess the agreement between the procedures. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess interobserver and intraobserver reliability. The coefficient of variation was used to evaluate precision. Results Both procedures showed good reliability, with mean intraobserver ICCs of 0.977/0.971 for CBCT and 0.881/0.912 for MRI. The average interobserver ICCs were 0.965 for CBCT and 0.833 for MRI. A Bland-Altman analysis for the cephalometric tracing revealed a similar range of agreement between the two modalities; the bias range (mean ± SD) was − 0.25–0.66 mm (0.174 ± 0.31) for distances and − 0.41–0.54° (0.12 ± 0.33) for angles. Conclusions Within the main limitation of this pilot study, that is, the small sample, it is possible to state that cephalometric measurements on 3T-MRI seem to possess adequate reliability and repeatability and that they show satisfying agreement with values measured on CBCTs. An MRI examination does not expose patients to ionizing radiation and could provide an alternative to CBCT for three-dimensional cephalometrics in the future.

Validity and Reliability of Masseter Muscles Segmentation from the Transverse Sections of Cone-Beam CT Scans Compared with MRI Scans

Automatic Masseter Muscle Accurate Segmentation from CBCT Using Deep Learning-Based Model.

Masseter Muscle Segmentation from Cone-Beam CT Images Using Generative Adversarial Network.

Comparison of Micro-Ct and Cone Beam Ct on the Feasibility of Assessing Trabecular Structures in Mandibular Condyle

Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Study of Masseter Muscle Segmentation in Patients With Hemifacial Microsomia

Reliability assessment of craniofacial and airway measurements: a comparative study between multidetector computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography

Deep learning segmentation of mandible with lower dentition from cone beam CT

Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults

[Segmentation and Accuracy Validation of Mandibular Molar and Pulp Cavity on Cone-Beam CT Images by U-net Neural Network].

A unique artificial intelligence-based tool for automated CBCT segmentation of mandibular incisive canal

One Step before 3D Printing—Evaluation of Imaging Software Accuracy for 3-Dimensional Analysis of the Mandible: A Comparative Study Using a Surface-to-Surface Matching Technique

[Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of 3D TMJ analysis performed by different methods of processing computed tomograms]

Influence of exposure protocol, voxel size, and artifact removal algorithm on the trueness of segmentation utilizing an artificial‐intelligence‐based system

Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐based segmentation of the mandibular canal in CBCT

Comparison of Deep Learning Segmentation and Multigrader-annotated Mandibular Canals of Multicenter CBCT scans

A Deep Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of Zygomatic Bones from Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images: A Proof of Concept

Accuracy and reliability of craniofacial manual landmark identification on cone beam CT images of dry skulls

Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Grayscale Density in Determining Bone Architecture in the Posterior Mandible: an in Vivo Study with Microcomputed Tomography Validation.

Masseter Segmentation from Computed Tomography Using Feature-Enhanced Nested Residual Neural Network.

A Modified Protocol to Evaluate Masseter Morphology Based on Automatic Segmentation and Registration

Reliability and Validity of Abdominal Skeletal Muscle Area Measurement Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging