Abstract:Objective: To explore an automatic landmarking method for anatomical landmarks in the three-dimensional (3D) data of the maxillary complex and preliminarily evaluate its reproducibility and accuracy. Methods: From June 2021 to December 2022, spiral CT data of 31 patients with relatively normal craniofacial morphology were selected from those who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. The sample included 15 males and 16 females, with the age of (33.3±8.3) years. The maxillary complex was reconstructed in 3D using Mimics software, and the resulting 3D data of the maxillary complex was mesh-refined using Geomagic software. Two attending physicians and one associate chief physician manually landmarked the 31 maxillary complex datasets, determining 24 anatomical landmarks. The average values of the three expert landmarking results were used as the expert-defined landmarks. One case that conformed to the average 3D morphological characteristics of healthy individuals' craniofacial bones was selected as the template data, while the remaining 30 cases were used as target data. The open-source MeshMonk program (a non-rigid registration algorithm) was used to perform an initial alignment of the template and target data based on 4 landmarks (nasion, left and right zygomatic arch prominence, and anterior nasal spine). The template data was then deformed to the shape of the target data using a non-rigid registration algorithm, resulting in the deformed template data. Based on the unchanged index property of homonymous landmarks before and after deformation of the template data, the coordinates of each landmark in the deformed template data were automatically retrieved as the automatic landmarking coordinates of the homonymous landmarks in the target data, thus completing the automatic landmarking process. The automatic landmarking process for the 30 target data was repeated three times. The root-mean-square distance (RMSD) of the dense corresponding point pairs (approximately 25 000 pairs) between the deformed template data and the target data was calculated as the deformation error of the non-rigid registration algorithm, and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of the deformation error in the three repetitions was analyzed. The linear distances between the automatic landmarking results and the expert-defined landmarks for the 24 anatomical landmarks were calculated as the automatic landmarking errors, and the ICC values of the 3D coordinates in the three automatic landmarking repetitions were analyzed. Results: The average three-dimensional deviation (RMSD) between the deformed template data and the corresponding target data for the 30 cases was (0.70±0.09) mm, with an ICC value of 1.00 for the deformation error in the three repetitions of the non-rigid registration algorithm. The average automatic landmarking error for the 24 anatomical landmarks was (1.86±0.30) mm, with the smallest error at the anterior nasal spine (0.65±0.24) mm and the largest error at the left oribital (3.27±2.28) mm. The ICC values for the 3D coordinates in the three automatic landmarking repetitions were all 1.00. Conclusions: This study established an automatic landmarking method for three-dimensional data of the maxillary complex based on a non-rigid registration algorithm. The accuracy and repeatability of this method for landmarking normal maxillary complex 3D data were relatively good.

Accuracy and reliability of craniofacial manual landmark identification on cone beam CT images of dry skulls

Precision of Cephalometric Landmark Identification from Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Accuracy and Reliability of Craniofacial Landmark Identification Based on Three-Dimensional Images

Automated landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography: Accuracy and reliability.

A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis

The Reliability of Three-Dimensional Landmark-Based Craniomaxillofacial and Airway Cephalometric Analysis.

Automatic Landmark Annotation and Measurement of 3D Mandibular Morphology Using Non-Rigid Registration: A Preliminary Exploration and Accuracy Assessment

Reproducibility of Landmarks on Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis for Orthognathic Surgery

Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review

Comparison of Craniofacial Anthropometric Measurement Accuracy of Manual Technique vs. Cone-Beam CT Scanning

Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data

[Study on the method of automatically determining maxillary complex landmarks based on non-rigid registration algorithms]

Reliability and Reproducibility of Landmarks on Three-Dimensional Soft-Tissue Cephalometrics Using Different Placement Methods.

Reliability assessment of craniofacial and airway measurements: a comparative study between multidetector computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography

[Accuracy of Different Registration Methods for Laser-Scanned Dental Cast Data and Maxillofacial Cone-Bean CT Data].

[Evaluation of Craniofacial Asymmetry Based on Cone-Beam CT Image].

Automatic Detection of Craniomaxillofacial Anatomical Landmarks on CBCT Images Using 3D Mask R-CNN.

Automatic craniomaxillofacial landmarks detection in CT images of individuals with dentomaxillofacial deformities by a two-stage deep learning model

Accuracy of Implant Height and Width Measurement with Triaxial Rotation Method Based on Cone-beam CT

Automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks

A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images