Reviewing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Why and How?

Ahmad Syaukat,Muhammad Alvin Shiddieqy Pohan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967124s00396
IF: 2.6
2024-10-25
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10_suppl3, October 2024. Introduction & Objectives:Revision ACL reconstruction occurred in 3.9- 9.2% cases of ACL repairs cases. Multiple revisions also increased comorbidities and lowers return-to-sport opportunity. We aimed to answer risk factors affecting requirements of revision ACL reconstruction and comparison of different techniques utilized for ACL reconstructions.Materials & Methods:PubMed and Europe PMC database were searched using following MeSH terms: "("revision" AND ("acl" OR "anterior cruciate ligament") AND "reconstruction" AND "outcomes")". This systematic review was conducted using PRISMA algorithm, searches yielded 1,649 abstracts for screening After employing screening criteria, final number of 32 relevant peer-reviewed open access studies from years 2018-2023. All authors read and voted for inclusion to paper. All papers were compiled, relevant information extracted, and narrated.Results:Gender was found to play some role in subsequent ACL reconstruction after primary ACL reconstruction failure. Another risk factors for revision ACL reconstruction included younger age (less than 30 years old) and use allograft for reconstruction. Revision ACL reconstruction conducted less than one year after symptoms were first experienced resulted in better outcome. The revision group more frequently experienced failure of the previous meniscal repair. Higher sport activity, or on the opposite, involvement in sport was an outcome of better revision ACL reconstruction. Surgical ACL reconstruction with internal bracing significantly decreased risk of ACL revision. Choices of graft, including greater utilization of autograft, and usage of BTB graft may improve patient outcomes.Conclusions:Younger age, allograft use, higher physical activity, and failure to repair meniscal damage risked revision ACL repair. Newer techniques may prevent ACL re-rupture and improve primary ACL repair outcomes. Choosing autograft and newer techniques results in better outcomes.
orthopedics,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?