Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10_suppl3, October 2024. Introduction:Since Indonesia enjoys more social and economic growth in last past years, more Indonesian especially gen Millennial and gen Z enjoy sports. So the incidence of sports injuries are increasing, among those are ACL injuries. Since the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgeries is increasing, so is the number of revision surgeries for a failed ACLR. The spectrum of ACL failure includes symptoms of recurrent instability, pain, and/or stiffness.Although primary ACL reconstruction is a successful operation, success rates may still range from 75% to 97%. Consequently, several thousand revision ACL reconstructions are performed annually and are unfortunately associated with inferior clinical outcomes when compared with primary reconstructions. Therefore sharing and learning from each other to improve the outcome of revision ACL reconstructions among us is good and beneficial.Discussion:Several factors which contribute to ACL failure may be identified as patient-related, surgeon-related, and biological factors. Among these, malposition of tunnel especially femoral-tunnel and recurrent trauma are the most common causes.In planning the revision ACL surgery, it is paramount to do detailed patient assessment, imaging, and studying details of the previous surgery. Among all, possible infection has to be ruled out prior to revision and identify the need for any bony reconstructive procedure. Osseous malalignment in the coronal or sagittal planes may need correction along with or prior to revision ACL surgery.In revising ACL reconstruction surgery, we need to make decision whether it can be performed as a one-stage or two-stage procedure. Severe tunnel dilatation, infection, or arthrofibrosis necessitates a two-stage approach. Associated meniscus tears and cartilage injuries are more common in revision than in primary surgery and need to be managed appropriately. Extra-articular reconstruction for controlling anterolateral instability is frequently required as well.Conclusion:Though revision ACL reconstruction surgery is not a routine procedure and a complex undertaking one, an excellent result can be achieved with regard to graft stability, return to play, and functional knee instability yet are generally inferior to primary ACL reconstruction.A staged approach with autograft reconstruction is recommended in any circumstance in which a single-stage approach results in suboptimal tunnel position, graft fixation, or biological milieu for enthesis healing.Patient expectations must be tempered because functional outcomes and return to pre-injury sports are usually inferior to a primary surgery.

Revision ACL Reconstruction Surgery: Tips and Tricks