Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10, October 2024. Background:Despite a growing body of literature regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), there remains a wide diversity in surgical technique and clinical practice across providers.Purpose:To (1) describe current ACLR practice preferences among members of the Herodicus society and (2) determine whether these preferences are influenced by years in practice and overall surgical volume.Study Design:Cross-sectional study.Methods:A 24-question survey investigating surgeons' practices and preferred ACLR surgical techniques was sent via email to all active Herodicus Society members. Survey responses were subdivided by years of experience and overall ACLR annual case volume. Descriptive statistics were compiled and chi-square testing was utilized to determine the significance of experience and case volume on survey responses.Results:Of the 113 invited Herodicus Society members who perform ACLR, 69 (61%) completed the survey. Respondents had a mean ± SD of 30.9 ± 9.8 years of experience in clinical practice and performed a mean of 96.0 ± 50.7 primary and 21.6 ± 16.9 revision ACLR annually. Of revision cases, 72.1% were performed using a single-stage technique. Mean frequency of graft usage by surgeon was bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (58.6%), quadriceps autograft (14.6%), hamstring tendon autograft (14.0%), and allograft (11.8%). The plurality of surgeons responded that they used anterolateral augmentation "rarely" in primary ACLR (39.1%) and "sometimes" in revision ACLR (31.9%), with the majority performing lateral extra-articular tenodesis (66.7%) rather than anterolateral ligament reconstruction (14.5%). Most surgeons would not allow a 20-year-old football player to return before 7 months after ACLR (71.0%) but highly valued return-to-sports testing to determine readiness (94.2%). Higher volume surgeons performed single-stage revision ACLR at a significantly higher rate (79.8% vs 62.9%, P = .02) and significantly differed in return-to-sports criteria, with a greater proportion relying primarily on biometric testing (P = .01).Conclusion:The survey demonstrated that, in the Herodicus Society, a wide range of preferences exist regarding ACLR surgical technique. Bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft is the most frequent primary ACLR graft choice. Most participants have not embraced newer techniques such as anterolateral or suture tape augmentation. Return to sports is generally not allowed before 7 months and heavily factors-in return-to-sports testing metrics, suggesting that purely time-based criteria for return to sports is not modern practice among elite sports medicine surgeons.

A Comprehensive Review of Graft Choices and Surgical Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Outcome Analysis

Navigating Post-operative Challenges: A Comprehensive Review of Complications Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Tear Surgery

Comparing massed-trial instruction, distributed-trial instruction, and task interspersal to teach tacts to children with autism spectrum disorders.

Complications and Resource Utilization Associated With Mechanical Ventilation in a Medical Intensive Care Unit in 2013

Current trends in graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction – part I: anatomy, biomechanics, graft incorporation and fixation

A Review on Biomechanics of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Materials for Reconstruction

Normal form generation of S5 functions via truth functions

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: principles of treatment

Current progress in neural crest cell motility and migration and future prospects for the zebrafish model system

Continual green fluorescent protein monitoring of promoter activity in plants.

Biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fixation methods and implications on clinical outcomes

Confocal microendoscope for use in OB/GYN applications

Role of the family in recovery and major depression.

Reviewing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Why and How?

Beta-adrenergic regulation of uncoupling protein expression in swine.

Graft choices for paediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: State of the art

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Treatment Requires Consideration of Physical Examination, Graft Selection, Surgical Technique, Rehabilitation, and Expected Outcomes With a Primary Goal of Prevention of Failure or Revision Surgery

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Evidence-Based Concepts on Reconstruction, Repair and Future Developments

Clinical Results of Primary Repair Versus Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Contemporary Trials

Functional Outcome in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair versus Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis

Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques and Postoperative Care Among Leaders in the Field: A Survey of the Herodicus Society