Accuracy of Individualized Custom Femoral Cutting Guides in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty of Femoral Specimens
Cai Junfeng,Ma Min,Zeng Wen,Luo Shuling,Yuan Feng,Zhou Wei,Yang Shuo,Wang Han,Yin Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2017.05.005
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the feasibility and accuracy of the Individualized Custom Femoral Cutting Guides in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty ( UKA) of femoral specimens, and provide an experimental basis for clinical application. Methods From January 2016 to February 2017, 40 adult femoral specimens were selected from the Department of anatomy, affiliated medical university of Fudan University. There were 22 males and 18 females. The age was 35 - 78 years and the height was 152 -178 cm. The digital table method was randomly divided into the trial group(individualized custom femoral cutting guides group, 20 femurs) and the control group(20 femurs). The trial group used individualized custom femoral cutting guides assisted UKA surgery, CT was performed preoperatively for data collection, and then design a cutting guide with 3D reverse technology, then 3D printing technology was used to produce individualized custom femoral cutting guide. At last, the surgery navigation templates were applied in the personalized UKA. In the control group, conventional fixation osteotomy was used in UKA. The operation was performed in the same group of medical groups. The two groups were compared in terms of osteotomy time and alignment of the lower limb. Results In the trial group, the navigation templates all contacted closely the bony structures of femoral condyle with no displacement. The osteotomy time were (3. 31 ± 0. 56) min the trial group and (4. 45 ± 0. 74) min in the control group, respectively (t = - 5. 500, P <0. 01). The postoperative femoral component valgus/ varus angle (FCVA) were 1. 31° ± 0. 86° in the trial group and 2. 84° ± 1. 58° in the control group, respectively (t = - 3. 789, P < 0. 01) . Correspondingly, the femoral component posterior slope angle (FCPSA) were 8. 84° ± 0. 60° and 6. 25° ± 1. 96°, respectively (t = 5. 661, P < 0. 01) . There was significant difference between the two groups, the postoperative tibial component valgus/ varus angle and tibial component posterior slope angle in the trial group were closer to 0° and 10° , respectively, which indicated the position of femoral prosthesis was more precise. Conclusions The individualized custom femoral cutting guides does improve the accuracy of femoral prosthesis position in UKA and saving time.