Abstract:Phenotype and/or genotype misclassification can: significantly increase type II error probabilities for genetic case/control association, causing decrease in statistical power; and produce inaccurate estimates of population frequency parameters. We present a method, the likelihood ratio test allowing for errors (LRTae) that incorporates double-sample information for phenotypes and/or genotypes on a sub-sample of cases/controls. Population frequency parameters and misclassification probabilities are determined using a double-sample procedure as implemented in the Expectation-Maximization (EM) method. We perform null simulations assuming a SNP marker or a 4-allele (multi-allele) marker locus. To compare our method with the standard method that makes no adjustment for errors (LRTstd), we perform power simulations using a 2/k factorial design with high and low settings of: case/control samples, phenotype/genotype costs, double-sampled phenotypes/genotypes costs, phenotype/genotype error, and proportions of double-sampled individuals. All power simulations are performed fixing equal costs for the LRTstd and LRTae methods. We also consider case/control ApoE genotype data for an actual Alzheimer's study. The LRTae method maintains correct type I error proportions for all null simulations and all significance level thresholds (10%, 5%, 1%). LRTae average estimates of population frequencies and misclassification probabilities are equal to the true values, with variances of 10e-7 to 10e-8. For power simulations, the median power difference LRTae-LRTstd at the 5% significance level is 0.06 for multi-allele data and 0.01 for SNP data. For the ApoE data example, the LRTae and LRTstd p-values are 5.8 x 10e-5 and 1.6 x 10e-3, respectively. The increase in significance is due to adjustment in the LRTae for misclassification of the most commonly reported risk allele. We have developed freely available software that performs our LRTae statistic.

PASTRY: achieving balanced power for detecting risk and protective minor alleles in meta-analysis of association studies with overlapping subjects

Power Analysis of Principal Components Regression in Genetic Association Studies.

Impact of genotyping errors on statistical power of association tests in genomic analyses: A case study.

Association Studies with Imputed Variants Using Expectation-Maximization Likelihood-Ratio Tests

Analysis of Case-Control Association Studies: SNPs, Imputation and Haplotypes

Computing Asymptotic Power and Sample Size for Case-Control Genetic Association Studies in the Presence of Phenotype And/or Genotype Misclassification Errors.

Increasing Power for Tests of Genetic Association in the Presence of Phenotype And/or Genotype Error by Use of Double-Sampling.

Meta-SAIGE: Scalable and Accurate Meta-Analysis for Rare Variants

Improving Power for Robust Trans-Ethnic Meta-Analysis of Rare and Low-Frequency Variants with A Partitioning Approach

Power analysis and sample size estimation for sequence-based association studies

More Powerful Multiple Testing in Randomized Experiments with Non-Compliance

Robust Methods for Disease-Genotype Association in Genetic Association Studies: Calculate P-values Using Exact Conditional Enumeration instead of Asymptotic Approximations

Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies

Kernel-smoothed permutation for extreme P-value estimation in genetic association studies

Linear Models for Analysis of Multiple Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms with Quantitative Traits in Unrelated Individuals

Summary-statistics-based power analysis: A new and practical method to determine sample size for mixed-effects modeling.

Optimal testing using combined test statistics across independent studies

A Robust and Powerful Two‐step Testing Procedure for Local Ancestry Adjusted Allelic Association Analysis in Admixed Populations

A Geometric Perspective on the Power of Principal Component Association Tests in Multiple Phenotype Studies

Addressing researcher degrees of freedom through minP adjustment

Computationally efficient meta-analysis of gene-based tests using summary statistics in large-scale genetic studies