Abstract:It is well established that phenotype and genotype misclassification errors reduce the power to detect genetic association. Resampling a subset of the data (e.g, double-sampling) of genotype and/or phenotype with a gold standard measurement is one method to address this issue. We derive the non-centrality parameter (NCP) for the recently published Likelihood Ratio Test Allowing for Error (LRTae) in the presence of random phenotype and genotype errors. With the NCP, power and sample size can be analytically determined at any significance level. We verify analytic power with simulations using a 2**k factorial design given high and low settings of: case and control genotype frequencies, phenotype and genotype misclassification probabilities, total sample size, ratio of cases to controls, and proportions of phenotype and/or genotype doublesamples. We also perform example applications of our method assuming equal costs for the LRTae method and the standard method that does not use double-sample information (LRTstd) to determine if power gain due to double-sampling a proportion of samples outweighs the reduction in sample size due to additional costs in obtaining double-samples. Our results showed a median difference of at most 0.01 between analytic and simulation power for the factorial design settings, with maximum difference of 0.054. For our cost/benefits analysis calculations, results for genotype errors are that double-sampling appears most beneficial (in terms of power gain) when cost of double-sampling is relatively low, irrespective of the proportion of individuals double-sampled. In the presence of phenotype error, there is always power gain using the LRTae method for the parameter settings considered. We have freely available software that performs power and sample size calculations for the LRTae method and cost/benefits analyses comparing power for LRTae and LRTstd methods assuming equal costs.

Robust Methods for Disease-Genotype Association in Genetic Association Studies: Calculate P-values Using Exact Conditional Enumeration instead of Asymptotic Approximations

Exact conditional p-values from arbitrary ranking of a sample space: An application to genome-wide association studies

Fast and Accurate Approximation to Significance Tests in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Nonparametric Tests of Associations with Disease Based on U‐Statistics

Hypothesis testing at the extremes: fast and robust association for high-throughput data

Fast permutation tests and related methods, for association between rare variants and binary outcomes

Single-Locus Genetic Association Analysis By Ordinal Tests

A powerful MAF-neutral allele-based test for case-control association studies

Efficient and powerful familywise error control in genome-wide association studies using generalized linear models

Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies

Pooled Association Tests for Rare Genetic Variants: A Review and Some New Results

Retrospective Versus Prospective Score Tests For Genetic Association With Case-Control Data

Power Estimation Of Multiple Snp Association Test Of Case-Control Study And Application

Computing Asymptotic Power and Sample Size for Case-Control Genetic Association Studies in the Presence of Phenotype And/or Genotype Misclassification Errors.

Analysis of Case-Control Association Studies: SNPs, Imputation and Haplotypes

Permutation p-values should never be zero: calculating exact p-values when permutations are randomly drawn

Impact of genotyping errors on statistical power of association tests in genomic analyses: A case study.

Kernel-smoothed permutation for extreme P-value estimation in genetic association studies

A Nonparametric Alternative to the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test in Genetic Case-Control Association Studies: the Jonckheere-Terpstra Trend Test

Powerful extreme phenotype sampling designs and score tests for genetic association studies

Fast Approximation of Small P-values in Permutation Tests by Partitioning the Permutations