Abstract:Motivation: In genome-wide rate comparison studies, there is a big challenge for effective identification of an appropriate number of significant features objectively, since traditional statistical comparisons without multi-testing correction can generate a large number of false positives while multi-testing correction tremendously decreases the statistic power.Results: In this study, we proposed a new exact test based on the translation of rate comparison to two binomial distributions. With modeling and real datasets, the exact binomial test (EBT) showed an advantage in balancing the statistical precision and power, by providing an appropriate size of significant features for further studies. Both correlation analysis and bootstrapping tests demonstrated that EBT is as robust as the typical rate-comparison methods, e.g. chi(2) test, Fisher's exact test and Binomial test. Performance comparison among machine learning models with features identified by different statistical tests further demonstrated the advantage of EBT. The new test was also applied to analyze the genome-wide somatic gene mutation rate difference between lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), two main lung cancer subtypes and a list of new markers were identified that could be lineage-specifically associated with carcinogenesis of LUAD and LUSC, respectively. Interestingly, three cilia genes were found selectively with high mutation rates in LUSC, possibly implying the importance of cilia dysfunction in the carcinogenesis.Availability and implementation: An R package implementing EBT could be downloaded from the website freely: http://www.szu-bioinf.org/EBT.Contact: wangyj@szu.edu.cnSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

A Minimax Optimal Ridge-Type Set Test for Global Hypothesis With Applications in Whole Genome Sequencing Association Studies

EBT: a Statistic Test Identifying Moderate Size of Significant Features with Balanced Power and Precision for Genome-Wide Rate Comparisons

A copula-based set-variant association test for bivariate continuous or mixed phenotypes

A Shrinkage Method for Testing the Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium in Case‐Control Studies

Shrinkage-based regularization tests for high-dimensional data with application to gene set analysis

Efficient variant set mixed model association tests for continuous and binary traits in large-scale whole genome sequencing studies

Hypothesis testing at the extremes: fast and robust association for high-throughput data

Fast and Accurate Approximation to Significance Tests in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Enhancing the Power to Detect Low-Frequency Variants in Genome-Wide Screens

Multiple testing in genome-wide association studies via hierarchical hidden Markov models

Global and Simultaneous Hypothesis Testing for High-Dimensional Logistic Regression Models

Nonlinear Tests For Genomewide Association Studies

Robust joint analysis allowing for model uncertainty in two-stage genetic association studies

Simultaneous Detection of Signal Regions Using Quadratic Scan Statistics With Applications to Whole Genome Association Studies

Heterocedasticity-Adjusted Ranking and Thresholding for Large-Scale Multiple Testing

A high-dimensional omnibus test for set-based association analysis

The eigen higher criticism and eigen Berk-Jones tests for multiple trait association studies based on GWAS summary statistics.

A powerful score-based test statistic for detecting gene-gene co-association

HYST: a hybrid set-based test for genome-wide association studies, with application to protein-protein interaction-based association analysis.

The Choice of Null Distributions for Detecting Gene-Gene Interactions in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Hypothesis setting and order statistic for robust genomic meta-analysis