Comparative assessment of Ti‐6Al‐4 V titanium alloy fatigue life improvement by vibratory peening, shot peening, and vibratory finishing

Maxime Paques,Apratim Chakraborty,Benoit Changeux,Hong Yan Miao,Waqas Muhammad,Sylvain Turenne,Kaan Inal,Etienne Martin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.14447
IF: 3.373
2024-09-27
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Abstract:The effects of vibratory peening (VP), shot peening (SP), and SP followed by vibratory finishing (SPVF) on the surface and fatigue properties of Ti‐6Al‐4 V were compared to conventional low‐stress grinding (LSG). VP processing produced seven times smoother surface finish than SP and 66% deeper compressive residual stresses (CRS) but with 12% lower magnitudes. SPVF produced optimal surface properties with a perfectly flat surface and CRS‐like SP. All three mechanical surface treatments generated similar fatigue life improvements (108–122%) over LSG when the cyclic stress was below the yield stress. Above the yield stress, most of the CRS relaxed during the first cycle in VP specimens, resulting in up to 97% fatigue life improvement over LSG. The CRS relaxed more gradually in SP specimens leading to larger (up to 239%) fatigue life improvement. This shows the need to amplify CRS magnitudes produced in VP to maximize fatigue life improvement.
materials science, multidisciplinary,engineering, mechanical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?