Abstract:Background and Objective: Previous studies showed the mouth was the center of communication in the face and had significant influence on individual’s self-esteem and social acceptance in modern society.Today esthetics has become increasingly important in the practice of modern dentistry and is synonymous with a natural,harmonious appearance.Many patients seek dental care due to the desire to look more attractive by improving their smiles.The lips form the frame during enjoyable smile around the oral region and thus define the esthetic zone including teeth,gingiva and adjacent soft tissue.The dynamic esthetics of showed teeth and soft tissue influences patients’ psychological health and social life.Using implant restoration to restore loss teeth is accepted by both dentists and patients nowadays due to its long-term success durability,no deterioration of neighboring teeth and predictable rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions.The demand for real life looking implant-supported restorations in the esthetic zone is met by qualified dental professionals.The aim of this study is to evaluate the periimplant soft tissue esthetics and special technical management in the maxillary esthetic zones of different situations.Materials and Methods: Totally 57 patients were enrolled in this study consecutively in Department of Implant Dentistry,Peking University,School Hospital of Stomatology.A standard therapeutic protocol was undertaken including pre-treatment examination,confirmation of the treatment plan and signature of the consent form.Patients were classified into two groups: Group I: bone graft prior to or during implant insertion (39 cases),Group II: immediate implant with flapless technique (18 cases).All the patients underwent sequential gingival architecture remodeling using implant-supported temporary prostheses.Esthetic evaluations included papilla index and the labial peri-implant soft tissue fullness.Peri-implant papilla was evaluated according to the papilla classification reported by Jemt in 1997.Results: Totally 73 implants were placed in 57 cases inclusing 36 ReplaceSpeedy (Nobel Biocare,G teborg,Sweden),20 Ankylos (DENTSPLY Friadent,Mannheim,Germany) and 17 Camlog (Camlog,Wimsheim,Germany,Camlog Rootline).The mean follow-up was 32.7 months (24-64 months) and no implant was lost until the last recall.Group I: 11 patients underwent onlay graft as well 28 GBR during implant insertion.53 implants were placed.Papilla evaluation showed that Degree 0 was found in 0 implant site as well 5 in Degree I,32 in Degree II,16 in Degree III,0 in Degree IV.Peri-implant fullness evaluation showed that Degree 0 was found in 10 implant sites as well 38 in Degree I,5 in Degree II.Group II: Immediate implant placement was employed without flap elevation and bone substitute particle was grafted between the extraction spaces.20 implants were placed.Papilla evaluation showed that Degree 0 was found in 0 implant site as well 0 in Degree I,1 in Degree II,19 in Degree III,0 in Degree IV.Peri-implant fullness evaluation showed that Degree 0 was found in 1 implant sites as well 19 in Degree I,0 in Degree II.Conclusion: The esthetic outcome of implant restoration in maxillary esthetic zone is influenced by bone support and quality/quantity of the peri-implant soft tissue with the prosthetic reconstruction.Preservation of as much of both the hard and soft tissue architecture as possible and methods to reconstruct it and modify it are major considerations in treatment.Onlay graft and GBR can create bone volume to maintain soft tissues predictably.Immediate implant placement with flapless technique can preservethe natural teeth profile and be less invasive and shorten the therapy period comparing with bone graft group.Size and shape of the transmucocal prosthetic abutments and framework is important to achieve an esthetic result.

Interimplant Papilla Reconstruction at Second-Stage Surgery: A Technique.

Inter-Implant Papilla Reconstruction via a Bone and Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Case Report with a Long-Term Follow-up

Interimplant papilla reconstruction: assessment of soft tissue changes and results of 12 consecutive cases

[Timing and surgery option of keratinized mucosa augmentation around implant site].

A Palatal Roll Envelope Technique for Peri-Implant Mucosa Reconstruction: a Prospective Case Series Study.

Modified interproximal tunneling technique with customized sub-epithelial connective tissue graft for gingival papilla reconstruction: report of three cases with a cutback incision on the palatal side

Subperiosteal Papilla Augmentation With a Non-Animal-Derived Hyaluronic Acid Overlay Technique

[Application of Attached Gingiva Reconstruction in Implant-Supported Dental Prosthesis].

Papilla reconstruction: Interdisciplinary consideration for clinical success

The Papilla Base CTG: A Novel Approach for Interdental Soft Tissue Reconstruction

Peri-implant keratinized gingiva augmentation using xenogeneic collagen matrix and platelet-rich fibrin: A case report

The role of subepithelial connective tissue graft for reconstruction of interdental papilla: Clinical study

Regenerative Surgical Flap to Maintain Interdental Papilla around Dental Implant

Modified roll envelope technique combined with apically repositioned flap (MRARF) for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation---A case series

Papilla Alteration in Different Gingival Biotypes at Single Implant-Supported Restoration in Anterior Maxilla

Split Pedicle Roll Envelope Technique Around Implants and Pontics: a Prospective Case Series Study.

In-Situ Onlay Grafting Combined with Titanium Mesh for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Anterior Maxillary Ridge.

Modified one-stage technique of laterally positioned flap with subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence in the esthetic zone: A 5-year follow-up

Papillae Alterations Around Single-Implant Restorations in the Anterior Maxillae: Thick Versus Thin Mucosa.

Peri-implant Soft Tissue Special Management Using Implant-Supported Provisional Prostheses in Maxillary Esthetic Zone

Peri-implant Soft Tissue Special Management in Maxillary Esthetic Zone