Peri-implant Soft Tissue Special Management in Maxillary Esthetic Zone

Haiyang Yu

2011-01-01

Abstract:Background and Objective: Previous studies showed the mouth was the center of communication in the face and had significant influence on individual’s self-esteem and social acceptance in modern society.Today esthetics has become increasingly important in the practice of modern dentistry and is synonymous with a natural,harmonious appearance.Many patients seek dental care due to the desire to look more attractive by improving their smiles.The lips form the frame during enjoyable smile around the oral region and thus define the esthetic zone including teeth,gingiva and adjacent soft tissue.The dynamic esthetics of showed teeth and soft tissue influences patients’ psychological health and social life.Using implant restoration to restore loss teeth is accepted by both dentists and patients nowadays due to its long-term success durability,no deterioration of neighboring teeth and predictable rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions.The demand for real life looking implant-supported restorations in the esthetic zone is met by qualified dental professionals.The aim of this study is to evaluate the periimplant soft tissue esthetics and special technical management in the maxillary esthetic zones of different situations.Materials and Methods: Totally 57 patients were enrolled in this study consecutively in Department of Implant Dentistry,Peking University,School Hospital of Stomatology.A standard therapeutic protocol was undertaken including pre-treatment examination,confirmation of the treatment plan and signature of the consent form.Patients were classified into two groups: Group I: bone graft prior to or during implant insertion (39 cases),Group II: immediate implant with flapless technique (18 cases).All the patients underwent sequential gingival architecture remodeling using implant-supported temporary prostheses.Esthetic evaluations included papilla index and the labial peri-implant soft tissue fullness.Peri-implant papilla was evaluated according to the papilla classification reported by Jemt in 1997.Results: Totally 73 implants were placed in 57 cases inclusing 36 ReplaceSpeedy (Nobel Biocare,G teborg,Sweden),20 Ankylos (DENTSPLY Friadent,Mannheim,Germany) and 17 Camlog (Camlog,Wimsheim,Germany,Camlog Rootline).The mean follow-up was 32.7 months (24-64 months) and no implant was lost until the last recall.Group I: 11 patients underwent onlay graft as well 28 GBR during implant insertion.53 implants were placed.Papilla evaluation showed that Degree 0 was found in 0 implant site as well 5 in Degree I,32 in Degree II,16 in Degree III,0 in Degree IV.Peri-implant fullness evaluation showed that Degree 0 was found in 10 implant sites as well 38 in Degree I,5 in Degree II.Group II: Immediate implant placement was employed without flap elevation and bone substitute particle was grafted between the extraction spaces.20 implants were placed.Papilla evaluation showed that Degree 0 was found in 0 implant site as well 0 in Degree I,1 in Degree II,19 in Degree III,0 in Degree IV.Peri-implant fullness evaluation showed that Degree 0 was found in 1 implant sites as well 19 in Degree I,0 in Degree II.Conclusion: The esthetic outcome of implant restoration in maxillary esthetic zone is influenced by bone support and quality/quantity of the peri-implant soft tissue with the prosthetic reconstruction.Preservation of as much of both the hard and soft tissue architecture as possible and methods to reconstruct it and modify it are major considerations in treatment.Onlay graft and GBR can create bone volume to maintain soft tissues predictably.Immediate implant placement with flapless technique can preservethe natural teeth profile and be less invasive and shorten the therapy period comparing with bone graft group.Size and shape of the transmucocal prosthetic abutments and framework is important to achieve an esthetic result.