Abstract:This article examines international commercial arbitration, one of the most popular methods for the resolution of disputes that arise in the context of international commercial relations. The volume of trade between Russia and China has been gradually increasing in recent years, which testifies to the fact that the study of international commercial arbitration legal regulation in both nations is extremely relevant. The authors examine the concept of international commercial arbitration entities, as well as the sources of legal regulation that govern their establishment and operation in Russia and Mainland China. In addition, the procedures for case consideration, the elaboration of arbitration agreements, the rules for the creation of an arbitration commission, the requirements for arbitral awards and other aspects are investigated. The authors come to the conclusion that the regulations governing international commercial arbitration are similar in the two countries and are based on international law and national legal acts. Both Russia and China have adopted the norms outlined in the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law into their legal systems although to different degrees. Both countries provide similar arbitration agreement norms and support the arbitration clause autonomy principle. The difference lies in the fact that China does not follow the competence-competence principle (the arbitrators’ power to determine their own competence to consider a certain dispute). Instead, the issue is referred either to the arbitration commission or to the state court for resolution. On the other hand, arbitrators in Russia have the right to determine their competence by themselves. According to Chinese law, a party requires arbitration court mediation in order to be able to submit a request for provisional protection measures to the state court, while under Russian law adirect request is allowed. In China, the norms for the recognition and enforcement of aforeign arbitration award by the court do not provide for the court’s ruling to be challenged; the refusal of the recognition and enforcement shall be possible only after the award has been considered by the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. In Russia, the legislation allows for both challenging and refusing the decision to recognize and enforce the award.

A Case Study: The Validity of Arbitration Clause in Bill of Lading

Development Of Maritime Limitation Of Liability In China (1993-2011)

Bills of Lading's Freedom of Contract:with Special Reference to the Development of the International Legislation and to a Special Issue under the Chinese Law

A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Regulation of International Commercial Arbitration in Russia and Mainland China

A juristic analysis on arbitration

The Arbitration Validity Of Bot Concession Agreement In China

International Arbitration of Maritime Delimitation

Enforcing International Commercial Arbitral Awards: A Comparative Study Between China and the United States

International Commercial Litigation and Arbitration Research Essay

The Proper Extension of the Acceptance Scope of Arbitration

A Study of the Legal Effect to the Third-party Referred to the Arbitration Clause

Arbitration or Litigation?——Problems of Parallel Proceedings and the Solution in International Arbitration

When International Commercial Arbitration Meets China's Sanction Laws: Living Together but Remaining Apart?

A Study on "delocalization" of International Commercial Arbitration

On the Choice of Law in International Commercial Arbitration

On the Application of Mandatory Arbitration to the Field of Civil and Commercial Affairs

International Arbitration of Maritime Delimitation: an Alternative for East Asia?

Discoursing Chinese Maritime Law’s Structure and Reform

Research on the Reform and Development of International Commercial Arbitration in China

Arbitration Within the China (shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone

Go dutch-a proposal to optimise the standards and procedures for judicial review of arbitral awards in china