Important Lessons Learned from the Application of Western Democracy in Taiwan

Gang Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16619/j.cnki.rmltxsqy.2018.08.012

2018-01-01

Abstract:Taiwan's political transition triggered by the sudden change of external conditions is inherently premature and hasty. The democratization of politics has revealed the national identity crisis inherent in the Taiwanese society. The problem of how to define and handle cross-Strait relations constitutes the main orientation of the blue-green confrontation and overlaps with the issue on whether social distribution or economic development should be prioritized. From the slanderous attacks during the election campaigning to votes buying and the use of political contacts, and from the questioning, boycotts, and physical engagement in the parliament meetings to the under-the-table negotiations between the political parties, and to the illegitimate lobbying on the street and the "heroic deeds" of besieging the public authorities, it can be found that inadequacies exist in Taiwan's practices of the Western "multiparty competitive democracy", such as "election overload", "party overload", "questioning overload", and "resistance overload", the underlying reasons are the poorly designed power system and electoral system and the overlapping social conflicts. When the "party competitive democracy" becomes inter-party confrontation, populism will naturally prevail over democratic principles such as majority rule and the rule of law. There is no guarantee for governance effect and "democratic deficits" are unavoidable.