Effects of Different Intervention Modes on Recovery of Acute Fatigue

Gao YANG,Lan-lan CHEN,Jia-hai LIU,Jian WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13837/j.issn.1006-8309.2017.03.0004
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective o research the effects of different recovery ways on muscle activity and comfort level based on maximum voluntary contraction force,EMG signal and muscle temperature after the multifidus and erector spinae muscles are getting fatigued.Methods Twelve subjects took different recovery ways which include meditation, active exercise, electrical stimulation and low, medium and high frequency vibration after their multifidus and erector spinae muscles were getting acute fatigued.Results One way ANOVA shows that different ways of recovery do not affect MVC significantly, but have effect on AEMG of erector spinae muscle.AEMG of erector spinae muscle is higher than others when electrical stimulation and mechanical vibration are used.Active exercise can make the temperature of multifidus and erector spinae muscles higher.Different ways of recovery have no significant influence on fatigue perceptions.Conclusion Active exercise is the best way to recover from muscle fatigue, especially has positive effect on maintaining body temperature.Short term electrical stimulation and mechanical vibration have no effects on recovery of muscle strength, but influence muscle fiber recruitment and threshold, thus they may accelerate muscle fatigue.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?