Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

Study on Legal Status of Procuratorial Organ During the Civil Action

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

On Coping Mechanisms of Procuratorate for the Public Opinion-Related Cases

Chinese Procuratorate's Functions and Power Allocation in Civil Procedure

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

Comparative Study on the Procuratorial Organs Positioning between Those Cross-strait

A Research of the Dynamic Mechanism of Criminal Procuratorial Organs to Protect Our Laws

Views on Conducting Civil Proceedings by Procuratorial Institutions

On the Outline of Improving the Civil Procuratorial Supervision System

Discussion on the Dynamical Mechanism of Procurator Organs to Investigate the Crime

Several Ideas concerning the Reform of the Supervision of Legal Proceedings

New Procuratorial Role in Marine Environmental Public Interest Litigation

Jurisprudential Thinking on the Perfection of Civil Procuratorial Power

From Supporting Suit to Commonweal Suit——On the Basis of Necessary Choice of Civil Administrative Procuratorial Right

The Boundary of Prosecutorial Supervision on Administrative Illegal Behavior

On the Reform and Perfecting of Adjudication Supervision of People's Procuratorate

Theoretical Misunderstanding and Institutional Reshaping of Necessary Joint Action

Civil Procedural Duties System in the Modern Society: A Research on the Different Roles of Judges and Parties in Clarifying Facts of Cases

Something Lost, Something Gained: Changes in China’s Procuratorate in Response to the Reform of the National Supervision System