Abstract:It is very important for geographers to know and understand the history of geographical ideas.The relative research findings about the history of geographical thoughts are not enough in China, and it has been ignored for a long time.The scholars who study the history of geographical ideas should not only master and state the geographical ideas and knowledge, and the formation and evolution of them, but also by way of this knowledge accurately understand the nature of the geography.In his book, Geoffrey Martin holds that the difference of the Earth's surface is the keystone of geography, and the main task of geographers is to describe and explain it.The whole history of geographical ideas can be divided into two major phases:the classical and modern times.The demarcation between the first and the second stage is in 1859, because the founders of modern geography, Humboldt and Ritter died in this year.Although geography has common object and subject all over the world, geography of each country has its own tradition and characteristics in the different stages.Geographers should absorb experiences from the history of ideas and learn from the professional counterparts, and avoid the dualism.In the future, geography will focus on some major issues about the development of humanity in the 21st century.In order to know and understand the historical facts of the geographical thoughts, geographers should more profoundly understand "history" and "thought" in the end, and not be limited in a field of geography.For scholars who study the history of geographical thoughts, they should combine tightly geography with history and thought, achieve the final goal that theorizes those historical facts of geographical thoughts.After all, geography is a kind of philosophy, because all geographers are influenced by some philosophical ideas.Judged by the level of philosophy and theory, the work of Martin's is traditional, broad and meticulous, but not enough deeply concerned with theory and philosophy and modern thoughts.

The Capability of the New Perspective in the Field of the Tang Dynasty's History Studies in the Context of Global History

Thinking on Methodology in Culture History of Literature in Tang Dynasty

Between the Classical Studies and Historiography: the Original Meaning and Objective of Meng Wentong's "Multi-Analysis of Chinese Ancient History"

A Review on Several Hot Spots of the Tang Study since the Reform and Opening Up

The Global Perspective, Intercultural Ability and Chinese Characteristics in Study of Contemporary Education

How can Chinese History Research Take the Lead in the World——Drawing on the experiences of Chinese history research of Taiwan and Japan

About perspectives in Studies of Economical History (Symposium)

Cultural Perspectives, Dialectical Thinking and the Theoretical Construction of New Disciplines:Contributions to Academic Research by Liu Denghan and Their Characteristics

The Theory and Method Discussion of Social History in New Period

The study of the history of translation in China: A methodological consideration ?With comments on A History of Translation in China

Tang Xianzu\'s Conception of History and Achievements in Historical Studies

The International Perspective and Cultural Interpretation in American Diplomatic History Studies in the Context of Globalization

On the New Trends in Recent Chinese Historiography-An Appraisal Based on Views from Social History

Retrospect and Reflection on the Studies of Literature of the Tang Dynasty in the Recent 30 Years

The Development Trend of Chinese History Studies in the United States from Philip C. C. Huang's Theory

Study of Western Intellectual History in China since the Reform and Opening-up

The Variety of Narrative Perspectives and Contemporary History Studies--A Case Study of the 1950S

A REVIEW ON ALL POSSIBLE WORLDS:A HISTORY OF GEOGRAPHICAL IDEAS

Introduction: the Implementation of the New Global History in China

A New Horizon of the Study of Classical Chinese Literature

On deepening the studies of the history of Western history