The Boundary and Concurrence of the Crime of Corruption and the Crime of Embezzlement of Public Funds

Hongbing Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16497/j.cnki.1672-335x.2015.03.012

2015-01-01

Abstract:The relationship between the constitutive elements of the crime of corruption and the crime of embezzlement of public funds is not opposite and exclusive ,but inclusive and concurrent .The funda‐mental difference between the two crimes does not lie in their purpose of permanent illegal possession ,but similar to the distinction between theft and unpunished embezzlement .To define the two we should make a comprehensive judgment such as the degree to w hich the act of embezzlement impedes the use of public funds ,the amount of embezzlement ,the time of embezzlement ,the embezzler's financial resources ,and the risk of public funds .We should take into account such factors as absconding with public funds ,balan‐cing the books ,and not entering into the account book ,w hich is a kind of information to judge but not ab‐solute .Whether the money is returned subjectively ,as long as it is not returned objectively ,belongs to "non refundable";w hether the money is returned subjectively ,as long as there is a larger amount of misap‐propriation of public funds unreturned ,is considered as "serious"misappropriation of public funds ;a huge amount of misappropriation of public funds without being returned can be sentenced to death penalty with the crime of corruption .Whoever does not control public funds for his own use can only become the object of corruption crime .Long term of misappropriating public property should be convicted of the crime of cor‐ruption .