Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively investigate the combined influence of a firm's political connection and diversification on corporate performance, and to explore whether firm's political connection has an impact on the diversification effect, and whether this diversification effect would promote its performance significantly or not.Design/methodology/approach - The research used a regression model to explore the correlation among political connection, diversification strategy, and corporate performance. The research subjects are the private enterprises listed on Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange in China for the period 2002-2005.Findings - The study found that: first, for those firms without political connections, the relationship between diversification strategy and corporate performance displayed an "inverted U" curve; for firms with political connection, the relationship was a "reverse L". Second, firms with political connections are more likely to implement a diversification strategy, especially unrelated diversification. Third, when implementing an internationalization strategy, private enterprises with political connections are more likely to expand through unrelated diversification strategy. Fourth, the diversification of the enterprises with political connection are more likely to promote the short-term accounting performance than those without political connection, but the unrelated diversification of politically connected enterprises would have a negative impact upon its future performance, that is to damage the company's market value.Originality/value - The paper expands the literature on the relationship between diversification and firm performance. It contributes to the research about the influence of political connection upon corporate performance.

Government Intervention and Characteristics and Performance of Diversified M & A-Empirical Evidence from Central and Local State-owned Listed Companies

Government intervention and corporate M & A transactions : Evidence from China

How Do Political Connections Cause SOEs and Non‐soes to Make Different M&A Decisions/performance? Evidence from China

Political Connections with Corrupt Government Bureaucrats and Corporate M&A Decisions: A Natural Experiment from the Anti-Corruption Cases in China

The Government Intervention, the Nature of Ownership and Enterprises'Mergers & Acquisitions

Government Intervention,Political Connections and the Mergers of Local Government-Controlled Enterprises

Marketization Level, Government Intervention and Firm M&As: Evidence from the Local SOEs in China

The Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions of Local State-Owned Enterprises: The Role of Home Country Government Involvement

Government Intervention,GDP Growth and Local SOE Overinvestment

The Government Intervention,Political Connection and Control Right Transfer:Evidence from Listed Companies in China

Diversification,Government Subsidy and Agricultural Firms' Performance:An Empirical Research on Chinese Agricultural Listed Companies

Government intervention in investment by Chinese listed companies that have diversified into tourism

Political Connections and Corporate Performance of Private Listed Companies:Government Intervention or GuanXi?

Toward Political Connection of Private Entrepreneurs, Government Intervention and Diversification

Political Connections, Government Intervention and Acquirer Performance in Cross‐border Mergers and Acquisitions: an Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Acquirers

State Ownership and Cross-border M&As: Evidence from Chinese MNCs

The Diversification Effects Of A Firm'S Political Connection And Its Performance Implications Evidence From China

Government Competition,Resource Allocation and "Shell Resource" Transfer

Government Interventions,Private Benefits of Control and State-owned Enterprises Merger and Acquisition

Governmental governance of host countries and cross-border merger and acquisition performance: Evidence from listed enterprises in China

Board cultural diversity, government intervention and corporate innovation effectiveness: Evidence from China