Abstract:This paper develops a Schumpeterian growth model with considering consumption and leisure externalities. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of patent protection policy on growth and inequality, as well as the interaction between policy effect and externalities. According to the log form utility function specification, this means that the elasticity of intertemporal substitution is unity. The following are the key findings of this paper. Patent protection policy encourages innovation and increases employment in the R&D industry, which enhances economic growth while increasing income inequality. In regard to externalities, an increase in the degree of consumption (leisure) externalities results in a higher (lower) growth rate and more (smaller) income inequality. When consumption (leisure) externality is greater intensity, the growth effect of patent protection policy becomes stronger (weaker), while its influence on expanding income inequality lessens (enhances). Finally, both the Pareto optimal patent protection policy and the optimal patent policy under the maximization of social welfare positively correlate with consumption externalities, but negatively correlate with leisure externalities.

Is Fast Technological Change Good

Empirical Study on Impact of Different Types of Patents on Technology Progress

On the Optimal Patent Protect

Patent Protection, Technological Change and Wage Inequality

Do Stronger Patents Stimulate or Stifle Innovation? the Crucial Role of Financial Development

A STUDY OF TYPES AND MODELS OF LAND- UTILIZATION TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION

Optimal Patent Protection, Directed Technological Change and Wage Inequality

Status Preference And The Effects Of Patent Protection: Theory And Evidence

DIRECTED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE: A KNOWLEDGE-BASED MODEL

When does elastic labor supply cause an inverted-U effect of patents on innovation?

Financial Intermediation in a Model of Directed Technological Change

PATENTABILITY, R&D DIRECTION, AND CUMULATIVE INNOVATION

Technological Innovation, Intellectual Property Protection and the Structure of Imports in China

Research on Capital Policy for Technological Innovation Capability in Chinese Firms

Patent protection, externalities, and income inequality

Human Capital Inflow, Firm Innovation and Patent Mix

Too Much Of A Good Thing: How Does Ownership Concentration Affect Innovation Speed In Chinese Manufacturing Firms?

Trade Policy and Innovation

The Escape-Infringement Effect of Blocking Patents on Innovation and Economic Growth

Technology Gap, Intellectual Property Right Protection and Economic Growth:An Empirical Study Based on Multi- country Data

From “made in China” to “innovated in China”: Necessity, Prospect, and Challenges