Abstract:In 1986, Teece proposed a seminal framework for analyzing why innovators may fail to benefit from their innovations. He argued, in part, that firms with the requisite complementary assets can often expropriate an innovator's returns especially when appropriability regimes are weak. In this paper, we explore the implications of this framework from the perspective of an incumbent firm—more precisely, of investors in that firm—facing innovation by established corporate rivals and by inventors from outside its industry. We demonstrate that the financial-market value of publicly traded firms depends on patented innovation by competitors (both established rivals and industry outsiders). Our empirical study generates three main results. First, the financial-market value of an incumbent is negatively associated with “important” patenting by outside inventors. Second, in industries characterized by weak appropriability regimes or by a strong reliance on complementary assets, this relationship is reversed: important patenting by outsiders is positively associated with the incumbent's financial-market value. Third, the effect of outsiders’ patented innovation on the focal incumbent is qualitatively different than that of established rivals’ patented innovation on the incumbent. These results are consistent with implications of Teece [Teece, D., 1986. Profiting from Innovation, Research Policy] and with recently developed models that formalize elements of his framework. More generally, these results support theories about both the market-stealing and spillover effects of innovation.

The Escape-Infringement Effect of Blocking Patents on Innovation and Economic Growth

When does elastic labor supply cause an inverted-U effect of patents on innovation?

Do Stronger Patents Stimulate or Stifle Innovation? the Crucial Role of Financial Development

Empirical Study on Impact of Different Types of Patents on Technology Progress

Status Preference And The Effects Of Patent Protection: Theory And Evidence

Patent protection, externalities, and income inequality

PATENTABILITY, R&D DIRECTION, AND CUMULATIVE INNOVATION

(When) Do Stronger Patents Increase Continual Innovation?

On the Optimal Patent Protect

Invention or Incremental Improvement? Simulation Modeling and Empirical Testing of Firm Patenting Behavior under Performance Aspiration

Human Capital Inflow, Firm Innovation and Patent Mix

Patent Protection, Technological Change and Wage Inequality

Exploring the Endogenous Relationship Between Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Economic Growth

Do Stronger Patents Lead To Faster Innovation? The Effect Of Clustered Search

Invention or Incremental Improvement?

Patent Trolls and Schumpeter's Creative Destruction

Trade Policy and Innovation

Profiting from technological innovation by others: The effect of competitor patenting on firm value

The Illusive Slump of Disruptive Patents

Innovation Economics Approach to Intellectual Property Law Scholarship

The struggle between capitalists and workers concerning patent and monetary policies in a Schumpeterian economy