Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to use samples from Chinese-listed companies to investigate the effects of interest rate deregulation and earnings transparency on company’s capital structure in China over the period of 2003–2015. In particular, the authors study the link between state-owned enterprises (SOEs), economic growth targets and marketization in China’s unique institutional context. Design/methodology/approach Based on the methodology of quantitative analysis, the authors use baseline and cluster analysis for all samples with full set of controls, for robustness tests of alternative proxy of interest rate control by using a cluster analysis at the firm level, regarding endogeneity tests conducted fixed effect model with adding instrument variables (IV), two-period factors regression method via IV and system generalized method of moments for dynamic analysis. Findings The results show that earnings transparency increases firm leverage and the additional tests suggest that such an effect takes place via a mechanism by reducing the cost of debt finance. However, information transparency could moderate the effects of interest rate deregulation on corporate capital structure. In addition, it finds that SOEs are less sensitive toward the changes of interest rates in China because lending to SOEs is policy-oriented and lacks of market evaluation of business risk. Government control is conducive to enhancing the transparency of the whole industry; however, market-oriented reform is conducive to enhancing the transparency of the company’s own information. Research limitations/implications The paper makes contribution to the relationship between earnings disclosure quality and capital structure in the Chinese unique institutional context, such as taking the progressive interest rate reform, SOES, different economic growth target and different marketization level in each province of China. The authors suggest that investors will pay more attention to the company’s own unique information transparency in the provinces with a high degree of marketization. As a potential direction for future research, the authors will investigate how the earnings transparency has impact on capital structure, and how such impact would depend on the transparency of specific business, the cap of foreign shareholding and the convenience of investment. Practical implications This research would be the target of banking market reform in order to bring a fair financing environment for all businesses in China. It implies that current experiment of interest rate liberalization in China is not as efficient as it could be in allocating funds across all businesses. State banks, SOEs and local governments are still the biggest players on both the demand and supply sides of the Chinese credit markets. Social implications The social implication of this paper lies in the fact that first, it provides additional evidence on the effect of market-oriented reforms through how the information transparency interacts with the financial decisions making of corporations. Second, it offers policy implication to banking market deregulation in China. Originality/value The paper makes contribution to the relationship between earnings disclosure quality and capital structure in the Chinese unique institutional context. This research tests the existing literature, such as Francis et al. (2004) and Zhang and Lu (2007), and suggests that informationally transparent firms have a higher debt ratio and lower effective interest costs on bank loans. In addition, this paper further explores the role played by interest rate deregulation in corporate finance, and in turn market fund allocation. This paper sheds new light on information transparency and explores the relationship between earnings disclosure quality and debt financing behaviors of Chinese publicly listed companies over the period of 2003–2015.

Employment, Social Objectives and Capital Resource Allocation

Government Employment Target Pressure and Labor Investment Efficiency in China: A Political Economy Perspective

State Ownership and Target Setting: Evidence from Publicly Listed Companies in China*

State Capitalism Vs. Private Enterprise

Access to public capital markets and employment growth

Employment relationships and firm performance: evidence from an emerging economy

An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Capital Structures of Chinese Publicly Listed Companies

Interest rate regulation, earnings transparency and capital structure: evidence from China

Does state capital equity affect ESG performance of private firms?—based on the perspective of sustainable development of Chinese enterprises

State-Owned Capital Participation and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

Could State-owned Shareholders Promote the Performance of Private Firms? Evidence from China

Does business strategy of the state‐owned enterprise affect the participation of non‐state‐owned capital?: Empirical evidence from China

State equity participation and financing constraints of private enterprises in China: Based on the competitive pressure perspective

Marketization,local unemployment rate and Social burdens of China Listed Companies

Divergent Interests between Central and Local Governments: Testing Theories of Public Ownership

The Impact of Employee Stock Ownership Plan on the Cost of Equity Capital: Evidence from China

Do state-owned enterprises prefer capital from private enterprises with better ESG performance? Evidence from China's mixed ownership reforms

Overemployment, Executive Pay-for-performance Sensitivity and Economic Consequences: Evidence from China

The Impact of Employee Stock Ownership Plan on Corporate Performance

Are State-Owned Enterprises Equally Reliable Information Suppliers? An Examination of the Impacts of State Ownership on Earnings Management Strategies of Chinese Enterprises

Earnings Management and Capital Resource Allocation: Evidence from China's Accounting-Based Regulation of Rights Issues