Abstract:As an ownership structure refining strategy, Employees Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) have been adopted smoothly with efficient outcomes in Western capitalist countries since it was proposed. In recent years, thanks to the great support from the government, the number of enterprises implementing ESOPs has been consistently increasing in China. However, many questions have come up during the implementation process in China. For example, does the implementation of ESOPs give the corporate performance an essential contribution? Are ESOPs beneficial for the state-owned enterprises, in terms of shares arrangement? Based on the binary economic theory and the principal-agent theory, in this paper, the two questions listed would be analyzed. Through the data analysis of the listed A-share companies from 2007 to 2018, it could be concluded that the implementation of ESOPs positively impacts the corporates’ performance, while there is no noticeable difference between the impacts of the state-owned companies and the non-state-owned ones.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the impact of Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) on corporate performance, especially in Chinese state - owned enterprises. Specifically, the paper explores the following two issues:
1. **Does the implementation of ESOPs make a significant contribution to corporate performance?**
- By analyzing the data of A - share listed companies from 2007 to 2018, the paper studies the long - term impact of ESOPs on corporate performance. The author uses 10 - year corporate performance data to explore the long - term effects of ESOPs on enterprises.
2. **Is the ESOP beneficial to the share arrangement of state - owned enterprises?**
- The paper further explores the different impacts of ESOPs between state - owned enterprises and non - state - owned enterprises. By dividing enterprises into two categories: state - owned enterprises and non - state - owned enterprises, the author analyzes the performance differences of ESOPs in these two types of enterprises.
### Research Background and Significance
#### Research Background
- **Global Perspective**: ESOPs were initially proposed in the United States to solve the social contradictions brought about by the gap between the rich and the poor in capitalist countries. With the support of the US government and Congress, ESOPs have received policy preferences such as tax relief and are widely used in various industries.
- **Chinese Perspective**: ESOPs in China have been gradually introduced and developed since the reform and opening - up policy and the shareholding system reform in the 1980s. However, due to the lack of relevant laws and regulations and supervision, a series of problems have emerged in the implementation of ESOPs in China, such as internal interest transfer and loss of state - owned assets. In 2014, the China Securities Regulatory Commission issued the "Guiding Opinions on the Pilot Implementation of Employee Stock Ownership Plans by Listed Companies", restarting and improving the rules of ESOPs. Since then, the number of enterprises implementing ESOPs in China has increased significantly.
#### Research Significance
- **Theoretical Significance**: Existing research mainly focuses on the short - term corporate performance after the announcement of ESOPs, while this paper uses 10 - year data to explore the long - term effects of ESOPs. In addition, this paper divides enterprises into state - owned enterprises and non - state - owned enterprises to compare the different impacts of ESOPs in different types of enterprises.
- **Practical Significance**: Through the empirical analysis of A - share listed companies, this paper shows the long - term impact of ESOPs on corporate development performance, aiming to provide support for the implementation of ESOPs under the modern corporate governance structure in China.
### Theoretical Basis and Literature Review
#### Theoretical Basis
- **Binary Economics Theory**: The binary economics theory proposed by Louis O. Kelso and Mortimer J. Adler believes that production factors include labor and capital. With the continuous development of industrialization and production specialization, the contribution of capital to social production gradually increases, while the contribution of labor relatively decreases. ESOPs increase employees' income, relieve the gap between the rich and the poor, and improve employees' loyalty and corporate performance by allowing employees to hold company shares.
- **Principal - Agent Theory**: The principal - agent theory points out that the separation of corporate management and ownership leads to agency problems. ESOPs reduce interest conflicts, lower agency costs, and improve employees' enthusiasm and creativity through the equity incentive mechanism.
#### Literature Review
- **Positive Impact**: Many studies have shown that ESOPs have a positive impact on corporate performance through tax relief, optimizing the capital structure, and motivating employees.
- **Negative Impact**: Some studies have also found that ESOPs may have a negative impact on corporate performance in some cases, especially when used for anti - takeover purposes.
- **No Significant Correlation**: Some studies believe that there is no significant correlation between ESOPs and corporate performance.
### Research Design
#### Research Hypotheses
- **H1**: ESOPs significantly improve corporate performance compared with enterprises that have not implemented ESOPs.
- **H2**: The positive impact of ESOPs on the performance of state - owned enterprises is more significant than that of non - state - owned enterprises.
#### Variable Selection
- **Dependent Variable**: Corporate performance (ROE), that is, return on net assets.
- **Explanatory Variable**: Employee shareholding ratio (Shr).
- **Control Variables**: Enterprise nature (State), enterprise scale (Size), capital structure (CS), board independence (Independent), top ten shareholders' shareholding ratio (H10 index), growth ability (Growth).
#### Model Construction
- **Model I**: