Chinese Social Science Citation Index(CSSCI)

Xinning Su

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0135.2000.04.001

2000-01-01

Abstract:In this article, author introduces the goals, significance and functions of Chinese Social Science Citation Index(CSSCI). And also describes its structure and flow direction of data.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Developing the Chinese social science citation index

Su Xin-ning,Han Xin-ming,Han Xin-ning,XN Su,XM Han,XN Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006535

2001-01-01

Online Information Review

Abstract:The Chinese Social Citation Index (CSSCI) covers over 500 scholarly Chinese journals in the humanities and social sciences. CSSCI provides an efficient tool for people to obtain information about Chinese social science research. Its CD-ROM disks have been manufactured and a Web site has been set up for people to search for information about it. In this article the authors introduce the goals, significance and functions of CSSCI and a detailed explanation of the data structure and the direction of data flow is provided.
The Design and Application Value of the Chinese Social Science Citation Index

Xinning Su,Sanhong Deng,Si Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0921-4

IF: 3.801

2012-01-01

Scientometrics

Abstract:From the application point of view, this article introduces the framework of the Chinese Social Science Citation Index (CSSCI). It expounds the idea of designing the CSSCI system, and its major functions and features in particular. The data organization as well as data encoding methods of the CSSCI system is well explained. Moreover, this article elaborates on how the citation index data can be used in analyzing discipline features, exploring research hotspots and developing trends, identifying important academic works and constructing academic network. Such efforts are supposed to help the readers better understand the application value of citation index system. It also provides the academic circle with a new understanding of citation index system.
A Quantitative Evaluation System of Chinese Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences

SU Xinning,ZHOU Ping

2009-01-01

Abstract:Based on analyses on existing indicators for evaluating journals in the humanities and social sciences and our experience in constructing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index（CSSCI）,we proposed a comprehensive system for evaluating Chinese academic journals in the humanities and social sciences.This system constitutes 8 primary indicators and 17 sub-indicators for multidisciplinary journals and 19 sub-indicators for discipline-specific journals.Each indicator or sub-indicator is assigned a suitable weight according to its importance in terms of measuring a journal’s academic quality and/or impact.
On CSSCI Citation Analysis As Application Prospect of Humanities and Social Sciences Evaluation Method

Qian Sun,Hongwei Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v5n1p108

2014-01-01

Journal of Management and Strategy

Abstract:CSSCI (Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index) has a certain influence and reorganization in Chinese humanities and social sciences, this paper tries to analyze the reasons for the spreading influence and characteristics of CSSCI to explore application prospect of citation analysis. It is pointed out that the CSSCI Citation analysis would be an important and feasible method of academic evaluation of humanities and social sciences. Establishing and improving CSSCI is bound to become an important aspect of constructing China's evaluation system of humanities and social sciences.
The development of the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index

Weina Hua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.2001.22.3.6

2001-04-01

Abstract:An account of the development and use of the first Chinese social sciences citation index, which has helped to fill a gap in the field of Chinese social science research, becoming a useful database for information retrieval and an important tool for evaluating research work and social science journals.
The Academic Impact of Chinese Humanities and Social Science Research

Zhang Jie,Su Xinning,Deng Sanhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530810847371

2008-01-01

Aslib Proceedings

Abstract:Purpose - This paper is written as an attempt to employ the Chinese Social Science Citation Index (CSSCI) in the evaluation of Chinese humanities and social science research.Design/methodology/approach - This paper uses statistics in the CSSCI (2000-2004) to analyze the academic impact of researchers, papers and works, institutions and regions on Chinese humanities and social science research.Findings - The authors identify 100 highly cited people, 50 highly cited papers, 50 highly cited works, 20 highly productive institutions and 20 highly cited institutions. Also provided is some regional information about Chinese humanities and social science research.Originality/value - It is hoped that the CSSCI, as well as the analysis and evaluation based on it, will give researchers a better understanding of Chinese humanities and social science research.
Academic Internationalization and Chinese Social Sciences Evaluation System:Taking SSCI Indicator as an Example

Xin XU,Kai JIANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8012.2014.06.022

2014-01-01

Abstract:Social Science Citation Index(SSCI)is a comprehensive social science literature database,estab-lished in the 1960s by the Institute for Scientific Information. Many Chinese universities have adopted SSCI publi-cations as an important indicator in academic evaluation system,which measures the research quality and capability of university faculties. This approach contributes to the internationalization of Chinese universities,as well as the establishment of an objective academic evaluation system. However,this approach has in practice adversely affect-ed the development of Chinese social science research. The reflection on SSCI indicators is related to the issue of academic internationalization,especially in developing countries. A diversified and localized evaluation system should be established in China,which could evaluate the academic achievements in social sciences more effectively and objectively.
Thoughts on the Disciplinary Status of Library Science and Information Science:Empirical Analysis Based on CSSCI

Su Xinning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13530/j.cnki.jlis.2010.04.009

2010-01-01

Abstract:Applying CSSCI as a base,this paper analyzes the research character of library science and information science,and points out the problems concerning each;namely,poor citation of documents,a lower proportion of foreign documents being cited,a lack of inter-organizational and interregional cooperation,a lack of theoretical research positive results.In order to promote the disciplinary status of library science and information science,the author points out that we must attach importance to theoretical research and innovation,improve the quality of academic research in papers,enhance social impact by promoting excellent studies,facilitate interdisciplinary cooperation and expand fields where research achievements can be applied.
A Glimpse at Chinese Study of the Humanities and Social Sciences from CSSCI

Su Xinning,Zou Zhiren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-8671.2008.02.042

2008-01-01

Abstract:The cited literature of a paper reveals the source of study, with the amount reflecting the depth of study and the language and the style showing the author’s reading inclination and academic resources. From the perspective of disciplines, differences can be discovered among disciplines in academic criteria, the depth of study, academic resources and so on. This paper deals with such differences among all the disciplines of the humanities and social sciences with the aid of CSSCI, analyzing the problems and then offering suggestions. Additionally, the article discloses malpractices in current Chinese study of the humanities and social sciences.
SCI-An International Stage of Academic Merit

LI Tie-jun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-3244.2005.03.017

2005-01-01

Abstract:The Science Citation Index (SCI) was introduced primarily as a method of information retrieval but has alsobeen used as an objective measure of the quality of an academic article. The SCI also provides the scientific communitywith a citations database indicating the number of cited references in indexed articles. In fact the impact factor is awidespread used and acknowledged source for judging the quality of a researcher. For several reasons, the SCI seems to bemore relevant. Because of this importance, there have been many pros and cons regarding the feasibility and potentialutility of the SCI as a mean of academic evaluation in the Chinese scientific community. Overall, China' s share in theworld scientific literature is much less than that of many other countries. Data on the observed citation impact of Chineseresearch in different fields, including medicine, show that the work done in China in general is not integrated well intointernational research. This article intended to introduce some basic aspects with respect to the SCI and to present apersonal view on its role as an international stage of academic merit.
Comparison of Citation Index Databases Home and Abroad in Their Retrieval Functions

Wang Jing,Hua Weina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-514X.2011.01.014

2011-01-01

Abstract:Choosing the authoritative foreign citation index database in humanities and social sciences SSCI、A&HCI,this paper makes a comparison study with the domestic database CSSCI in source data and retrieval functions,points out some disadvantageous problems,and gives some suggestions for the future development of CSSCI based on the analysis of their own characteristics.
An Analysis of the General Situation of Chinese Political Science Based CSSCI

Shu WEI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-5831.2008.05.015

2008-01-01

Abstract:Based on the datas provided by CSSCI,this paper analyzes the development and influence of Chinese Political science from 2005 to 2006.The analysis is carried out from several approaches,including the publishing papers,the citation,the language of the citation,the types of the papers,the funds effect,the influenced papers and books,etc.This paper also tries to reveal the characters,shortcomings and development through comparing with the other humanities and social sciences and also with itself before.
On the Application Prospect of Taking CSSCI Citation Analysis as the Evaluation Means of Humanities and Social Sciences

王周谊

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16365/j.cnki.11-4054/d.2009.01.018

2009-01-01

Abstract:It is of great significance to establish and improve the evaluation mechanism of humanities and social sciences for developing humanities and social sciences.CSSCI has admittedly a certain influence on China's social science circles.By analyzing the reasons of increasing influence of CSSCI and characteristics of CSSCI,this paper attempts to explore the application prospect of CSSCI as an evaluation tool of humanities and social sciences and holds that CSSCI citation analysis would be an important and feasible tool of academic evaluation of humanities and social sciences.Establishing and improving CSSCI is bound to become an important aspect of constructing China's evaluation system of humanities and social sciences.
Patterns and Impact of Collaboration in China’s Social Sciences: Cross-Database Comparisons Between CSSCI and SSCI

Gong Kaile,Cheng Ying

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04483-7

IF: 3.801

2022-01-01

Scientometrics

Abstract:This study quantitatively analyzes the patterns and impact of collaboration at author and country levels in China's social sciences from 1998 to 2017. Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) are combined as data sources to show a comprehensive picture of collaboration in China's social sciences, and to compare the differences in the way Chinese social scientists work when publishing nationally and internationally. Results show that there are huge differences in patterns and impact of collaboration between China's national and international publications in social sciences. Specifically, non-collaboration dominates in China's CSSCI papers while collaboration dominates in China's SSCI papers; two-authored is the main form of collaboration in China's CSSCI papers but the teamwork of three or more authors is the main form in China's SSCI papers; few of China's CSSCI papers are published in international collaboration but Sino-foreign cooperation is very common in China's SSCI papers; collaboration benefits citations of China's SSCI papers in all disciplines but international collaboration doesn't work well for citations of China's CSSCI papers. Besides, similarities between China's national and international publications can also be observed, e.g., disciplines more cooperative in China's CSSCI papers are also those more cooperative in China's SSCI papers; the top ten countries collaborate with China in CSSCI and SSCI are the same, and the USA accounts for about half of Sino-foreign collaborations in both CSSCI and SSCI. Finally, the usage of bibliometric databases and possible reasons for collaboration differences are discussed.
How to Calculate the Impact Factor of Chinese Journals of Social Sciences——Based on the Time Distribution of Citations of CSSCI

Yuan Peiguo,Wu Xiangdong,Ma Xiaojun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1027.2009.05.012

2009-01-01

Abstract:Journal impact factor is one of indicators of evaluation of academic journals.Time distribution of citations of CSSCI is very similar to that of SSCI.Based on statistics of time distribution of cited Chinese journals,Chinese academic journals of humanities and social sciences and source journals of CSSCI in citations of CSSCI,the cited peak-years of journals is the 2nd and 3rd year after publication.It is all the same to that of international journals.Thereby,the method of calculation of international journals is completely applicable to that of Chinese academic journals of humanities and social sciences.
Openness and Knowledge Sharing of Economics,Sociology,Law and Politics:A Comparative Study on Citations of Chinese Social Science Journals

Shi Jinchuan,Zhang Yuhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2011.08.171

2012-01-01

Abstract:As an important part of academic papers which comply with the norms of social science research,citations themselves are of great research value.On the basis of the collection of citation data from top Chinese journals in economics,sociology,law and politics and on the basis of internal and international comparison research,we find that economics and sociology are more open to research abroad while law and politics are less open.And in these subjects,the level of citations to other social sciences is comparatively low.We also find that the percentage of self-citation in economics decreased significantly while that in sociology,law and politics increased moderately between 1998 and 2008 according to the results of the comparison of interdisciplinary citations.On the other hand,the percentage of interdisciplinary citation of sociology and law to economics are quite high,while the percentage of interdisciplinary citation of politics to economics is low.We think that the lack of interdisciplinary journals and the lack of researchers are two key reasons for the underdevelopment of interdisciplinary research in China.
Reflections on the Use of SSCI Papers in Evaluating Social Sciences Research in Chinese Universities

Li Liu,Huilin Xue,Jing Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120943210

2020-07-27

ECNU Review of Education

Abstract:Purpose: This review demonstrates how to position Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) papers reasonably in order to promote the reform and development of the system for evaluating social sciences research (E-SSR) in China. Design/Approach/Methods: This review examines the contributions made by SSCI papers after such papers became a tool in the E-SSR system in Chinese universities, and the resultant issues. This review analyzes documents pertaining to the E-SSR systems of more than 50 world-class universities with consideration to the inherent characteristics and historical mission of social sciences research in China. The findings serve as the basis from which to examine the future trends in the reform of the E-SSR system in Chinese universities. Findings: The application of SSCI papers as an E-SSR tool is not common in world-class universities. To date, the reform of the E-SSR system in Chinese universities has involved: (i) establishing a pluralistic evaluation mechanism, with equal importance placed on SSCI papers and other research achievements; (ii) emphasizing the need for caution in using SSCI papers as an E-SSR tool and instituting distinct treatments for various disciplines; (iii) reducing the importance attached to journal language and ranking, while emphasizing innovation quality and practical contributions; and (iv) establishing China’s E-SSR standards in order to achieve an equilibrium between internationalization and localization. Originality/Value: This review argues that although SSCI papers constitute an indicator of E-SSR system, their importance must not be overstated. The main purpose of the E-SSR system is to facilitate the development of social sciences with a style and characteristics unique to China.
A CSSCI-Based Analysis of Economics Studies in China

郑江淮,王维明,胡笛

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-5831.2008.06.015

2008-01-01

Abstract:Using the data collected from CSSCI(Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index),this study seeks to analyze and evaluate the general situation of ecomonics studies in China from various perspectives.The analysis includes the improvement of research strength by examining citation frequencies of thesis papers in this field,extension of disciplinary horizon by investigating the types of citations,absorption of research findings from foreign countries by examining language categories,and a survey of various funded thesis papers.Furthermore,this article extends to make a statistical analysis of the thesis papers and academic works which have exerted an important influence upon the economics studies in China.
A Comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal hierarchies and inter-journal citation relations

Ping Zhou,Loet Leydesdorff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0911.3087

2009-11-16

Digital Libraries

Abstract:The journal structure in the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database (CSTPCD) is analysed from three perspectives: the database level, the specialty level and the institutional level (i.e., university journals versus journals issued by the Chinese Academy of Sciences). The results are compared with those for (Chinese) journals included in the Science Citation Index. The frequency of journal-journal citation relations in the CSTPCD is an order of magnitude lower than in the SCI. Chinese journals, especially high-quality journals, prefer to cite international journals rather than domestic ones. However, Chinese journals do not get an equivalent reception from their international counterparts. The international visibility of Chinese journals is low, but varies among fields of science. Journals of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) have a better reception in the international scientific community than university journals.
Study on Web Influence of CSSCI Source Journals

LIU Hong,SUN Jianjun,ZHENG Yanning,PAN Yuntao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2012.04.002

IF: 3.1759

2012-01-01

Journal of Intelligence

Abstract:Taking CSSCI source journals as data source,we get link indexes of relevant sites with Yahoo! Site Explorer and calculate correlation of journal ranking and the link indexes.Furthermore,we build the link index system of journal network evaluation,providing some guidance and suggestions to improve and optimize journal websites.

Chinese Social Science Citation Index(CSSCI)

Developing the Chinese social science citation index

The Design and Application Value of the Chinese Social Science Citation Index

A Quantitative Evaluation System of Chinese Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences

On CSSCI Citation Analysis As Application Prospect of Humanities and Social Sciences Evaluation Method

The development of the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index

The Academic Impact of Chinese Humanities and Social Science Research

Academic Internationalization and Chinese Social Sciences Evaluation System:Taking SSCI Indicator as an Example

Thoughts on the Disciplinary Status of Library Science and Information Science:Empirical Analysis Based on CSSCI

A Glimpse at Chinese Study of the Humanities and Social Sciences from CSSCI

SCI-An International Stage of Academic Merit

Comparison of Citation Index Databases Home and Abroad in Their Retrieval Functions

An Analysis of the General Situation of Chinese Political Science Based CSSCI

On the Application Prospect of Taking CSSCI Citation Analysis as the Evaluation Means of Humanities and Social Sciences

Patterns and Impact of Collaboration in China’s Social Sciences: Cross-Database Comparisons Between CSSCI and SSCI

How to Calculate the Impact Factor of Chinese Journals of Social Sciences——Based on the Time Distribution of Citations of CSSCI

Openness and Knowledge Sharing of Economics,Sociology,Law and Politics:A Comparative Study on Citations of Chinese Social Science Journals

Reflections on the Use of SSCI Papers in Evaluating Social Sciences Research in Chinese Universities

A CSSCI-Based Analysis of Economics Studies in China

A Comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal hierarchies and inter-journal citation relations

Study on Web Influence of CSSCI Source Journals