Abstract:In order to obtain a deeper understanding of the collaboration status in the big data field, we investigated the author collaboration groups and the core author collaboration groups as well as the collaboration trends in big data by combining bibliometric analysis and social network analysis. A total of 4130 papers from 13,759 authors during the period of 2011–2015 was collected. The main results indicate that 3483 of the papers are coauthored (i.e., 84.33% of all papers) from 12,016 coauthors (i.e., 87.33% of all authors), which represent a reputable level of collaboration. On the other hand, 91.83% of all the identified coauthors have published only one paper so far, reflecting a poor level of maturity of such authors. Through social network analysis, we observed that the author collaboration network is composed of small author collaboration groups and also that the authors are mainly from the computer science & technology field. As an important contribution of our study, we further analyzed the author collaboration network, culminating in the generalization of four subnet modes, which were defined by some papers: ‘dual-core’, ‘complete’, ‘bridge’ and ‘sustainable development’. It was found that the dual-core mode stands for the stage that researchers have just begun to study big data. Beginning of big data research, the complete mode tends to joint research, both the dual-core and complete modes are mostly engaged in the same project, and the bridge mode and the sustainable development mode represent, respectively, the popular and valued directions in the big data field. The results of this study can be useful for researchers interested in finding suitable partners in the big data field. By tracking the core authors and the key author collaboration groups, one can learn about the current developments in the big data field as well as predict the development prospects of such a field. Therefore, we expect with the results of our study summarized in this paper to contribute to a faster development of the big data field.

Influence Analysis of Core Authors in Scientometrics from an Integrated Perspective of Publication and Citation

Measuring Author Influence in Scientific Collaboration Networks

Comparative Study On Structure And Correlation Among Bibliometrics Co-Occurrence Networks At Author-Level

The Academic Social Network

Analysis of effects to scientific impact indicators based on the coevolution of coauthorship and citation networks

Author Influence Spreading Prediction Based on Co-Citation Interest Similarity

Mutual Influence in Citation and Cooperation Patterns

Twodimensional Measurement for Academic Influence of Researchers:Integration of Citation Impact and Collaboration Impact

Comparative Study on Structure and Correlation among Author Co-Occurrence Networks in Bibliometrics

A new scholars' impact evaluation method based on academic collaboration

Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis

Study on ScholarsˊEvaluation Method Based on Co-author Network

Scientometrics for Success and Influence in the Microsoft Academic Graph.

A Systematic Framework and Characterization of Influence-Based Network Centrality

The Bibliometrics Analysis of International Co-authorship in Chinese Library and Information Science

Measuring academic influence using heterogeneous author-citation networks

The Influence of Author Degree Centrality and L-Index on Scientific Performance of Physical Education and Training Papers in China Based on the Perspective of Social Network Analysis

A Study of the Influence of Collaboration Networks and Knowledge Networks on the Citations of Papers in Sports Industry in China

Literature Review of Academic Impact Measurement for Authors Based on Both Co-authorship and Citation Relationship

A Study on the Author Collaboration Network in Big Data*

Assessing the Qualitative Influence of Journals in a Citation Network