Analysis of effects to scientific impact indicators based on the coevolution of coauthorship and citation networks

Haobai Xue

2024-04-19

Abstract:While computer modeling and simulation are crucial for understanding scientometrics, their practical use in literature remains somewhat limited. In this study, we establish a joint coauthorship and citation network using preferential attachment. As papers get published, we update the coauthorship network based on each paper's author list, representing the collaborative team behind it. This team is formed considering the number of collaborations each author has, and we introduce new authors at a fixed probability, expanding the coauthorship network. Simultaneously, as each paper cites a specific number of references, we add an equivalent number of citations to the citation network upon publication. The likelihood of a paper being cited depends on its existing citations, fitness value, and age. Then we calculate the journal impact factor and h-index, using them as examples of scientific impact indicators. After thorough validation, we conduct case studies to analyze the impact of different parameters on the journal impact factor and h-index. The findings reveal that increasing the reference number N or reducing the paper's lifetime {\theta} significantly boosts the journal impact factor and average h-index. On the other hand, enlarging the team size m without introducing new authors or decreasing the probability of newcomers p notably increases the average h-index. In conclusion, it is evident that various parameters influence scientific impact indicators, and their interpretation can be manipulated by authors. Thus, exploring the impact of these parameters and continually refining scientific impact indicators are essential. The modeling and simulation method serves as a powerful tool in this ongoing process, and the model can be easily extended to include other scientific impact indicators and scenarios.

Digital Libraries

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

The paper aims to analyze the impact of various parameters on scientific impact metrics (such as journal impact factor and H-index) by establishing a co-evolution model of joint co-author networks and citation networks. Specifically, the paper addresses the following points:

1. **Modeling and Simulation**:
- Constructing joint co-author networks and citation networks using the preferential attachment mechanism.
- Updating the co-author network as new papers are published, considering each author's number of collaborations and the probability of introducing new authors.
- Simultaneously updating the citation network based on the specific number of citations each paper receives.

2. **Scientific Impact Metrics**:
- Calculating the journal impact factor and H-index as metrics of scientific impact.
- Validating the model's effectiveness through simulation experiments and analyzing the impact of different parameters on these metrics.

3. **Parameter Analysis**:
- The study finds that increasing the number of references or reducing the lifespan of papers significantly enhances the journal impact factor and average H-index.
- Increasing team size without introducing new authors or reducing the probability of new authors significantly increases the average H-index.

4. **Model Extension**:
- Proposing that this method can be easily extended to other scientific impact metrics and scenarios, thereby continuously improving the interpretation of scientific impact metrics.

Overall, the paper attempts to reveal how collaboration and citation behaviors in scientific literature affect the measurement of scientific impact through mathematical modeling and computer simulation methods, and to explore the mechanisms behind these metrics.