The Simultaneous Evolution of Author and Paper Networks

Katy Börner,Jeegar T. Maru,Robert L. Goldstone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307625100

2003-11-20

Abstract:There has been a long history of research into the structure and evolution of mankind's scientific endeavor. However, recent progress in applying the tools of science to understand science itself has been unprecedented because only recently has there been access to high-volume and high-quality data sets of scientific output (e.g., publications, patents, grants), as well as computers and algorithms capable of handling this enormous stream of data. This paper reviews major work on models that aim to capture and recreate the structure and dynamics of scientific evolution. We then introduce a general process model that simultaneously grows co-author and paper-citation networks. The statistical and dynamic properties of the networks generated by this model are validated against a 20-year data set of articles published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. Systematic deviations from a power law distribution of citations to papers are well fit by a model that incorporates a partitioning of authors and papers into topics, a bias for authors to cite recent papers, and a tendency for authors to cite papers cited by papers that they have read. In this TARL model (for Topics, Aging, and Recursive Linking), the number of topics is linearly related to the clustering coefficient of the simulated paper citation network.

Statistical Mechanics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the simultaneous evolution processes of scientific cooperation networks (i.e., author cooperation networks) and paper citation networks. Specifically, the researchers constructed a general process model, aiming to generate co - author networks and paper citation networks simultaneously, and verify whether the statistical and dynamic characteristics of these networks are consistent with the actual data. This model pays special attention to several key factors, such as topic distribution, literature aging effect, and recursive linking behavior, which jointly act on the formation and development of network structures.

### Key points of the model:
1. **Topic distribution**: The model assumes that authors and papers can be assigned to different topic areas, which helps to explain why the cooperation and citation patterns in some areas are different.
2. **Literature aging effect**: The model takes into account the phenomenon that literature gradually loses its citation value over time, which helps to explain why new papers are more likely to be cited.
3. **Recursive linking behavior**: The model assumes that when citing literature, authors will not only directly cite the papers they have read, but also cite other papers cited by these papers. This recursive behavior helps to explain the high - degree connectivity of some nodes in the network.

### Verification methods:
To verify the validity of the model, the researchers used the dataset of papers published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) from 1982 to 2001. By comparing the network characteristics generated by the model with those in the actual dataset, the researchers evaluated the accuracy and applicability of the model.

### Main contributions:
- **Integrated model**: This is the first model to simultaneously simulate multiple network structures, such as co - author networks and paper citation networks.
- **Introduction of aging effect**: By introducing the literature aging effect, the model better explains the non - power - law distribution phenomenon in the actual citation network.
- **Recursive linking mechanism**: The model introduces a recursive linking mechanism, which explains the formation process of high - degree connectivity nodes.

### Conclusion:
This model successfully captures the complex dynamic characteristics of scientific cooperation and citation networks, and is consistent with the actual data in multiple aspects. This provides a new perspective for understanding the spread of scientific knowledge and the mechanisms of scientific cooperation.