Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to measure author influence in scientific collaboration networks by considering the combined effects of multiple indexes. In the meanwhile, we intend to explore a method to avoid assigning subjective weights. Design/methodology/approach: We applied four centrality measures (degree centrality, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality and eigenvector centrality) and authors' published papers to the scientific collaboration network. The grey relational analysis (GRA) method based on information entropy was used to measure an author's impact in the collaboration network. The weight of each evaluation index was determined based on information entropy. The ACM SIGKDD collaboration network was selected as an example to demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness of our method. Findings: Author influence was not always positively correlated with evaluation indexes such as degree centrality and betweenness centrality. This implies that combined effects of multiple indexes should be considered in author impact analysis. The introduction of the GRA method based on information entropy can reduce the interference of human factors in the evaluation process. Research limitations: We only analyzed author influence from the perspective of scientific collaboration, but the impact of citation on author influence was ignored. Practical implications: The proposed method can be also applied to detect influential authors in bibliographic co-citation network, author co-citation network, bibliographic coupling network or author coupling network. It would help facilitate scientific collaboration and enhance scholarly communication. Originality/value: This paper proposes an analytical method of evaluating author influence in scientific collaboration networks, in which combined effects of multiple indexes are considered and the interference of human factors is reduced in the evaluation process.

Twodimensional Measurement for Academic Influence of Researchers:Integration of Citation Impact and Collaboration Impact

Measuring Author Influence in Scientific Collaboration Networks

Determining Scientific Impact Using a Collaboration Index

Literature Review of Academic Impact Measurement for Authors Based on Both Co-authorship and Citation Relationship

A new scholars' impact evaluation method based on academic collaboration

Mutual Influence in Citation and Cooperation Patterns

The relationship between interdisciplinarity and citation impact-a novel perspective on citation accumulation

Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices

AIRank: Author Impact Ranking Through Positions in Collaboration Networks

Collaborative Characteristics and Networks of National, Institutional and Individual Contributors Using Highly Cited Articles in Environmental Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded

Measuring the Social Influences of Scientist Groups Based on Multiple Types of Collaboration Relations.

The Influence of Author Degree Centrality and L-Index on Scientific Performance of Physical Education and Training Papers in China Based on the Perspective of Social Network Analysis

Collaboration Size and Citation Impact in Big Data Research.

Measuring academic influence using heterogeneous author-citation networks

Scholars Influence Evaluation Based on Time Series Heterogeneous Network

Identifying Important Scholars Via Directed Scientific Collaboration Networks

Investigating Scientific Collaboration Through the Sequence of Authors in the Publication Bylines and the Diversity of Collaborators.

Evaluation Method on the Inlfuence of Researchers in the Academic Network

The Academic Social Network

The x-index: A new citation-distance-based index to measure academic influence

The Structure and Evolution of Scientific Collaboration from the Perspective of Symbiosis