Abstract:As one of the most influential international large-scale educational assessments, the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) provides a valuable platform for the horizontal comparisons and references of international education. The cognitive diagnostic model, a newly generated evaluation theory, can integrate measurement goals into the cognitive process model through cognitive analysis, which provides a better understanding of the mastery of students of fine-grained knowledge points. On the basis of the mathematical measurement framework of PISA 2012, 11 attributes have been formed from three dimensions in this study. Twelve test items with item responses from 24,512 students from 10 countries participated in answering were selected, and the analyses were divided into several steps. First, the relationships between the 11 attributes and the 12 test items were classified to form a Q matrix. Second, the cognitive model of the PISA mathematics test was established. The liner logistic model (LLM) with better model fit was selected as the parameter evaluation model through model comparisons. By analyzing the knowledge states of these countries and the prerequisite relations among the attributes, this study explored the different learning trajectories of students in the content field. The result showed that students from Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Russia shared similar main learning trajectories, while Finland and Japan were consistent with their main learning trajectories. The primary learning trajectories of the United States and China were the same. Furthermore, the learning trajectory for Singapore was the most complicated, as it showed a diverse learning process, whereas the trajectory in the United States and Saudi Arabia was relatively simple. This study concluded the differences of the mastery of students of the 11 cognitive attributes from the three dimensions of content, process, and context across the 10 countries, which provided a reference for further understanding of the PISA test results in other countries and shed some evidence for a deeper understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of mathematics education in various countries.

New Trend of PISA Participation and the Discussion of its Essence

The Relationship of Shanghai Winning PISA and the Curriculum Reform

Lessons Learned from PISA: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment

Post-PISA Education Reforms in China: Policy Response Beyond the Digital Governance of PISA

PISA, global reference societies, and policy borrowing: The promises and pitfalls of ‘academic resilience’

PISA Mathematics in 2021—An analysis of the CCR

PISA’s Influence on Thought and Action in Mathematics Education

Assessing Science Literacy for Developing Key Competencies——The framework,design and assessment of scientific literacy of OECD/PISA

Locating inclusion within the OECD’s assessment of global competence: An inclusive future through PISA 2018?

Global competence in PISA 2018: deconstruction of the measure

Unsustainable measures? Assessing global competence in PISA 2018

What Can PISA Tell Us About Students' Mathematics Learning in Shanghai, China?

International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models

PIRLS - the essence and significance of international research: ways of formation of literacy in primary school

Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field

The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia

Governing schooling through ‘what works’: the OECD’s PISA for Schools

Investigation to decline of science score of Chinese students in PISA 2015

Improving schooling through effective governance? The United States, Canada, South Korea, and Singapore in the struggle for PISA scores

The Global Education Race: Taking the Measure of PISA and International Testing

The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate