Abstract:Academic journal is an important medium of research publication and academic exchange.The academic journal evaluation system in China has been initially established,but quality and innovativeness evaluations are still weak.There are profound socio-economic,cultural,administrative reasons for this problem,which have caused negative impact on the value orientation of scholars and their research behavior,affected the objectivity and impartiality of academic evaluation,and undermined the cleanness and pureness of the academia. Scholars of the humanities and social sciences and library and information science experts have already reached a consensus that academic evaluation in the humanities and social sciences should be more diverse,localized and content-based,and there should be quality and innovativeness evaluations.In the past dozen years,academic journal evaluation is mainly quantitative and formal,but now more emphasis should be placed on content evaluation and innovativeness evaluation to create a fair and free environment for academic journal evaluation. On the premise of maintaining the reasonable elements in the existing academic journal evaluation system,this article proposes a combination of three new concepts including formal evaluation,content evaluation and effectiveness evaluation,and puts forward a new evaluation method integrating peer-review and bibliometric evaluation.The proposed combination of the three new concepts would be able to explain the history and the current situation of journal evaluation,and also predict its future.The aim of the new thinking and the approach to realize it is to overcome the institutional obstacles that hinder the healthy development of academic evaluation,to establish a fair and rational academic environment for scholars,and to create an open and constructive academic environment in the future.

On Reform of Academic Evaluation System of Universities and Colleges

Discussion on the Reform of PE Teacher Evaluation in Colleges from the Idea of Developmental Evaluation

Retrospect and Prospect of University Entrance Examination

University Innovative Competence Evaluation: Theory, Method and Strategy

The Undergraduate Teaching Evaluation System in China: Progress, Problems and Suggestions

Study on Cross Platform of Teaching Evaluation System

University Faculty Performance Evaluation System in China

Quality and Innovativeness in the Evaluation of Academic Journals

ON THE EVALUATION MODEL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS AND THEIR GAUGING SYSTEM IN COLLEGES/DEPARTMENTS OF UNIVERSITIES

Primary investigation on an evaluation system for teachers and teaching in research universities

On Reform of Graduate Education on the Base of the First-Level Discipline

Study on reform of university teachers′ teaching evaluation system from perspective of scholarship of teaching

Study on the Supervision and Evaluation System in Private University

On the Reform of the Education Evaluation System under the Background of Implementing New Courses

Evaluation of Universities in China:An Institutionalist Analysis

On Building Evaluation System of Humanities and Social Sciences

Faculty System Reform in Research Universities:Motivation,Operational Mechanism and Trends

Examination Exemption for Excellent Students and Its Effect on Students Capability and Quality Cultivation

Predicament of Professor-Undertaking Undergraduate Teaching and Its Solutions——views from Eight Leading Universities

Analysis of the Deficiencies in Current Academic Evaluation Mechanism in China

Thoughts on breaking away from the " paper-centric" orientation and establishing a new evaluation model of scientific and technological innovation in academic universities