Abstract:Project 211 is one of the most important educational policies in China, which aims at selecting a small number of “key universities” for sustainable development in the 21st century. These selected “key universities” have received substantial funding from the government so they can recruit outstanding faculty and be equipped with high quality facilities. Although this national policy has come into being for more than a decade, limited empirical studies have been conducted to examine how the policy influences students’ performance as well as whether the policy is perceived to interfere with test fairness. Using differential item analysis (DIF) and content analysis, this study examined the effect of group membership (key vs. non-key universities) on one of the large-scale high-stakes language tests–the Graduate School Entrance English Examination (GSEEE). The results identified a number of DIF/DBF, all favoring test takers from key universities. A review of the flagged items by three test reviewers found a myriad of potential factors including unbalanced learning opportunities, which may contribute to performance differences between two groups. However, none of the reviewers deemed that unbalanced educational opportunities brought bias and presented a threat to fairness. Fairness in this context is conceptualized to require individuals or groups who are less well-off to sacrifice social benefits and resources to those who are better off to achieve the overarching aim of maximizing economic benefit to the society.

A Dynamic Equivalence Model for Favorable Scoring Policy of Ethnic Minority Examinees in Gaokao

Higher Education Admission Policy and Social Class of Ethnic Minority: The Case of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China

The Implementation, Flexibility and Reasonable Selection of Bonus-Point Policy for Minority Candidates in College Entrance Examination from the Perspective of Educational Equality

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

An Investigation into the Policy of Bonus Scores for Minority Candidates at the College Entrance Examination

Misalignment between Test Scores and Colleges' Preferences: Chinese College Admission Reconsidered

Analysis of Transition and Problem of Gaokao Mark Adding Policy

The Policy of Minorities' Extra Scores under Provincial Enrollment Mode in College Entrance Examination

Reflections on the Policy of Minorities' Extra Scores in College Entrance Examination:A Positive Perspective

The Evolution of Ethnic Preferential Policies in the 21st Century

Test Fairness: Examining Differential Functioning of the Reading Comprehension Section of the GSEEE in China

Problems and Countermeasures of Preferential Policy of Minority in The College Entrance Examination

New Thoughts on Preferential Policy for Ethnic Minority Students in College Entrance Examination in China

Reverse Discrimination in National College Entrance Examination – Epitome of Preferential Ethnic Affairs Policies in China

Preferential policies for ethnic minority students in China's college/university admission

Matching Mechanisms and Matching Quality: Evidence from a Top University in China.

Matching Mechanisms and Matching Quality: Evidence from a Top School in China

The Influence of College Entrance Examination Policy on Educational Equity in China

Study on Ethnic Minority College Entrance Examination Extra Points Policies under the Perspective of Educational Equity

The Influence of Double Reduction Policy on Exam-oriented Education Model

Chinese College Admissions and School Choice Reforms: A Theoretical Analysis