Abstract:Project 211 is one of the most important educational policies in China, which aims at selecting a small number of “key universities” for sustainable development in the 21st century. These selected “key universities” have received substantial funding from the government so they can recruit outstanding faculty and be equipped with high quality facilities. Although this national policy has come into being for more than a decade, limited empirical studies have been conducted to examine how the policy influences students’ performance as well as whether the policy is perceived to interfere with test fairness. Using differential item analysis (DIF) and content analysis, this study examined the effect of group membership (key vs. non-key universities) on one of the large-scale high-stakes language tests–the Graduate School Entrance English Examination (GSEEE). The results identified a number of DIF/DBF, all favoring test takers from key universities. A review of the flagged items by three test reviewers found a myriad of potential factors including unbalanced learning opportunities, which may contribute to performance differences between two groups. However, none of the reviewers deemed that unbalanced educational opportunities brought bias and presented a threat to fairness. Fairness in this context is conceptualized to require individuals or groups who are less well-off to sacrifice social benefits and resources to those who are better off to achieve the overarching aim of maximizing economic benefit to the society.

Misalignment between Test Scores and Colleges' Preferences: Chinese College Admission Reconsidered

Chinese College Admissions and School Choice Reforms: A Theoretical Analysis

Chinese College Admissions Reforms : Experimental and Empirical Evaluations

An empirical evaluation of Chinese college admissions reforms through a natural experiment

Matching Mechanisms and Matching Quality: Evidence from a Top University in China.

The Combination of Fairness and Science in the Reform of College Entrance Examination

Preference Submission Mechanisms and Matching Qualities: An Empirical Study on China's College Entrance Examination System

Matching Mechanisms and Matching Quality: Evidence from a Top School in China

Chinese College Admissions and School Choice Reforms: an Experimental Study

A Motivation Perspective on College Admission Reform in Shanghai: The Effect of Providing More Choices and Multiple Evaluation Criteria

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

Fairness of the Boston Matching Mechanism in China's College Admissions

Timing is Everything ? An Experimental Investigation of Incomplete Information in Centralized Matching Mechanisms

From Boston to Shanghai to Deferred Acceptance: Theory and Experiments on a Family of School Choice Mechanisms

Preference Submission Timing in School Choice Matching: Testing Fairness and Efficiency in the Laboratory

The Institution of Merit: A Study of Chinese College Admissions

Matching inequality and strategic behavior under the Boston mechanism: Evidence from China's college admissions

The Policy of Minorities' Extra Scores under Provincial Enrollment Mode in College Entrance Examination

The Medium-Run Efficiency Consequences of Unfair School Matching: Evidence from Chinese College Admissions

Time-constrained Dynamic Mechanisms for College Admissions

Problems and Countermeasures of Preferential Policy of Minority in The College Entrance Examination