Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

Review of Chinese Administrative Philosophy

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

Administration: Reconsideration of the Theory of Relation Between a Country and Its Citizen Society

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law

Research on Paradigm of Chinese Public Administration:A Historical Review and Assesment

A Review of Contemporary Chinese Philosophy over the Past 60 Years

Glancing back Theoretical Foundation of Administrative Law : Evolution Of a Holism

REPRESENTATION AND DISCIPLINE:LOOKING AT ANCIENT CHINA'S ADMINISTRATION SPACE FROM PERSPECTIVE OF THE WESTERN RELATED SPACE THEORY

The Era of Prefectures and Counties: An Inquiry into the Power Structure and State Governance in Ancient Chinese Society

A Review of Administrative Law Research:2005-2006

Major Fields and Subjects for Public Administration Theory in China

New Agenda for the Study of Chinese Governance

Logic Foundation and Practical Text of Administration by Law

Public Administration Research in Mainland China: A Systematic Review of Chinese Public Administration in English Language Journals (1996–2016)

Ancient Chinese Concepts of Understanding Law

The analysis on economic administrative law

Balancing Local Concerns and Global Views: Western Administrative Theory in China’s Reform Practices

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

A Developmental Research on Modern Administrative Activity Mode

Politics-Administration Dichotomy Debate and Its Relevance to China's Governance Reform

Traditional Chinese Philosophies and Contemporary Leadership