Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

Politics-Administration Dichotomy Debate and Its Relevance to China's Governance Reform

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

Democratic Administration and Democracy in Administration——And Discussion on the Direction and Dilemma of Chinese Administrative Reform

New Agenda for the Study of Chinese Governance

Administration: Reconsideration of the Theory of Relation Between a Country and Its Citizen Society

Balancing Local Concerns and Global Views: Western Administrative Theory in China’s Reform Practices

CONTINUITY VERSUS CHANGE: EVOLVING TRAJECTORIES OF CHINESE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Major Fields and Subjects for Public Administration Theory in China

Marketization, globalization and administrative reform in China: a zigzag road to a promising future

Domestic Reform and Global Integration: Public Administration Reform in China over the Last 30 Years

What Government Shall Do?:A Reflection on Chinaese Administrative Reform

Governance and public administration in China

The "Necessary and Dangerous" Power: Administrative Prerogative in Constitutional Controversies of the Early Republic of China

Logic Foundation and Practical Text of Administration by Law

Disciplinary rationale and public administration field development

Civilizational Politics and Civilizational Public Administration:The New Task for the Development of Politics and Public Administration in the New Era

To Achieve Social Well-being through Democratic Governance:An Interpretation of the Political Nature of the Administrative Letters and Visits System in China

An Analysis of Administrative System Reform in China from the View of Progressive Decision-making Theory

Disciplinary Value of China's Public Administration Studies:Reference from Rosenblum's Value Framework

Governance Theory and Paradigmatic Progress in Public Administration